What do New York Film Critics’ Circle awards mean for Oscars?

The New York Film Critics’ Circle is so determined to be the first group to weigh in with its picks for the best of the year that the date of its decisionmaking keeps getting advanced. But how much influence does it have on the last group to be heard from — the motion picture academy which will reveal the Oscar winners 83 days from now on Feb. 22? 

This year’s big winner with the NYFCC was “Boyhood,” which won Best Picture, Director (Richard Linklater) and Supporting Actress (Patricia Arquette). Since we launched our Oscars prediction center, this film, that was a dozen years in the making, has led those same three categories. But will it go the distance? 

New York Film Critics’ Circle Awards: Complete list of winners

Over the past 20 years, only four times has the NYFCC agreed with the Oscars on Best Picture: “Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” (2003), “No Country for Old Men” (2007), “The Hurt Locker” (2009) and “The Artist” (2011).
 

Last year, “American Hustle” claimed three prizes from the Circle — taking home Best Picture, Supporting Actress (Jennifer Lawrence) and Screenplay — while Steve McQueen (“12 Years a Slave”) was named Best Director; all contended but lost at the Oscars. The other acting awards went to two eventual Oscar champs — lead Cate Blanchett (“Blue Jasmine”) and supporting player Jared Leto (“Dallas Buyers Club”)  — and Robert Redford (“All is Lost”) who was snubbed by the academy.

Blanchett became the 30th Best Actress winner at the NYFCC to go on to repeat at the Oscars (in addition, Peggy Ashcroft won this award but the Supporting Actress Oscar for “A Passage to India” in 1984). Note that the NYFCC did not meet in 1962 due to the newspaper strike. 

In its first half decade, the Circle foresaw two of the five Best Actress Oscar winners (their two-time honoree Greta Garbo was not among these). In the 1940s, it went only two for ten. Among those snubbed by the academy was Deborah Kerr, who picked up the first of her eventual three NYFCC awards in 1947 but never won any of her six Oscar bids.) It foresaw seven champs in the 1950s, four in each of the 1960s and 1970s, three in the 1980s and four again in the 1990s. While it predicted the Oscar winner just twice in the 2000s, it has done it twice already in the last four years. 

And Leto became just the 13th winner of the Supporting Actor award (introduced by the NYFCC in 1969) to also claim an Oscar. After missing out with its first pick — Jack Nicholson (“Easy Rider”) — the Circle predicted four Oscar winners in the 1970s, two in the 1980s, and then three apiece in the 1990s and 2000s. 

UPDATED: Experts’ Oscars predictions in 19 categories

In 2012, the NYFCC went with “Zero Dark Thirty” for Best Picture and Director (Kathryn Bigelow). While the film went on to lose the the top Oscar race to “Argo,” Bigelow was snubbed by the directors branch of the academy (the Oscar went to “Life of PI” helmer Ang Lee.) Daniel Day-Lewis (“Lincoln”) began his march to a third Oscar with a win from the NYFCC. However, two of the other NYFCC acting champs didn’t even reap Oscar bids —  Best Actress Rachel Weisz (“The Deep Blue Sea”) and Best Supporting Actor Matthew McConaughey (“Bernie” & “Magic Mike”) — while Best Supporting Actress winner Sally Field (“Lincoln”) lost her quest for a third Oscar to Anne Hathaway (“Les Miserables”). 

Day-Lewis was the 32nd Best Actor winner at the NYFCC to go on to repeat at the Oscars (in addition, Barry Fitzgerald won this award but the Supporting Actor Oscar for “Going My Way” in 1944).  After its first six winners were snubbed beginning in 1935, the Circle had a good run at forecasting Oscar winners: seven in the 1940s (including Fitzgerald), four in the 1950s, five in each of the 1960s and 1970s, and four in the 1980s.) After previewing only three of the Oscar winners in each of the 1990s and 2000s, it has gone two for four so far this decade. 

See latest Oscar rankings when the Experts’ predictions are combined

In 2011, the NYFCC named “The Artist” both Best Picture and Best Director (Michel Hazanavicius) and the academy did likewise. Meryl Streep won her fourth Best Actress prize from the Gotham critics for her portayal of British PM Margaret Thatcher in “The Iron Lady” before claiming her third Oscar for the role. Brad Pitt was cited as Best Actor by the NYFCC for his work in both “Moneyball” and “The Tree of Life” and Jessica Chastain was named Best Supporting Actress for three films: “The Help,” “Take Shelter” and “The Tree of Life.” Pitt reaped an Oscar bid for “Moneyball” while Chastain was recognized for “The Help.” Albert Brooks won over the NYFCC with his featured role in “Drive” but was snubbed by Oscar voters. 

“The Artist” was the most recent of the 31 NYFCC Best Picture winners to repeat at the Oscars following:  “The Life of Emile Zola” (1937), “Going My Way” (1944), “The Lost Weekend” (1945), “The Best Years of Our Lives” (1946), “Gentleman’s Agreement” (1947), “All the King’s Men” (1949), “All About Eve” (1950), “From Here to Eternity” (1953), “On the Waterfront” (1954), “Marty” (1955), “Around the World in 80 Days” (1956), “The Bridge on the River Kwai” (1957), “Ben-Hur” (1959), “The Apartment” (1960), “West Side Story” (1961), “Tom Jones” (1963), “My Fair Lady” (1964), “A Man for All Seasons” (1966), “In the Heat of the Night” (1967), “Annie Hall” (1977), “The Deer Hunter” (1978), “Kramer vs. Kramer” (1979), “Ordinary People” (1980), “Gandhi” (1982), “Terms of Endearment” (1983), “The Silence of the Lambs” (1991), “Schindler’s List” (1993), “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” (2003), “No Country for Old Men” (2007) and “The Hurt Locker” (2009).

Since the Circle was formed, only eight of their top picks have not been nominated for Best Picture: “Day for Night” (1973), “Amarcord” (1974), “The Player” (1992), “Leaving Las Vegas” (1995), “Topsy-Turvy” (1999), “Mulholland Drive” (2001), “Far from Heaven” (2002), and “United 93” (2006). 

RELATED:Boyhood,’ Timothy Spall, Marion Cotillard win New York Film Critics’ Circle Awards

And Hazanavicisu, who helmed “The Artist,” was the most recent of the 26 Best Director winners here to add an Oscar to their mantle. After getting it right the first time out with John Ford (“The Informer”), the Circle went 0 for 3 for the rest of the decade. It predicted seven Oscar winners in the 1940s (including two more for Ford), four in each of the 1950s and 1960s, just one in the 1970s (Woody Allen for “Annie Hall”), none in the 1980s, one again (Jonathan Demme for “Silence of the Lambs”) in the 1990s and six in the 2000s. 

The most recent of the 13 Supporting Actress winners at the NYFCC to repeat at the Oscars was Melissa Leo (“The Fighter,” 2010). The Circle predicted just one winner in the 1970s, five in the 1980s, two in the 1990s and four in the 2000s. 

2 thoughts on “What do New York Film Critics’ Circle awards mean for Oscars?

  1. I hope now there are serious hopes that the incredible Marion Cotillard can clear space for a ridiculously overdue second Oscar on her mantelpiece. Watching her win at the New York Film Critics Circle Awards the Best Actress Award twice at the same year made me incredibly happy! Wow, for both her awe-inspiring performances in both Two Days, One Night and The Immigrant That’s really quite a feat. Personally, I’m rooting for both but since only one can make the cut so that she avoids split voting with herself, I’d give a slight edge to her phenomenal turn in Two Days, One Night. Marion Cotillard’s performance as Sandra in the latest Dardennes Brothers masterpiece is the kind of performance that needs to be seen to be truly believed. There’s really no way to overhype her work there, trust me. You rarely get to watch such a towering performance from an actor / actress in your entire life. With her unmatched work in this film, you feel like she’s pushing acting to a whole another level. She makes you feel the deepest and most complex emotions for a woman who has to fight against depression and the possibility of losing her job at the same time. Acting definitely doesn’t get any better. Yes, a foreign-language drama of social realism by the Dardennes Brothers is definitely not the Academy voters’ cup of tea, but they really have to honor a tremendous performance in such an important film, let alone from an exceptional actress who has putting out consistently brilliant performances the last seven (!) years after her much unforgettable win for her legendary performance in La Vie En Rose. She has to score her second win this year and if not for that at least a ridiculously overdue second Oscar nomination. If not, I don’t see the point of having a Best Actress In A Leading Role Award at The 87th Academy Awards ceremony.

  2. Statistics are not a good indication of arguing how this critics group and the Academy may or may not correspond. Rather, it is the underlying difference in consensus taste between film critics (pertaining to New York in this case) versus the film industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More News from GoldDerby

Loading