Oscar cynics are wrong: Julianne Moore does deserve to win for ‘Still Alice’

I’ve never been the biggest Julianne Moore fan.

The first time I ever saw her on screen was as a dino-scientist in “The Lost World: Jurassic Park” (1997). I was 13 and I recall thinking, “I won’t be sad if she gets eaten.”

I guess this puts me in the mindset of an average Oscar voter, who’ve nominated her four previous times but never awarded her the trophy. In other words, we like her, we just don’t love her.

That is, until I saw Moore’s gut-wrenching performance in “Still Alice.”

Oscars news: Julianne Moore on connecting with ‘Still Alice,’ three acts of Meryl Streep

As a linguistics professor struggling with early-onset Alzheimer’s, Moore completely transforms from a fun-loving wife and mother to a shattered woman whose mind melts away before our eyes, one painful memory at a time. By the time she fails to find the bathroom and loses control of her bladder, I was ready to declare Moore’s raw embodiment of Alice Howland one of the greatest performances I’ve ever seen on the silver screen.

Imagine my surprise, then, to find that I’m one of the few who thinks that Moore — who scored an Emmy for playing Sarah Palin in HBO’s “Game Change” (2012) — is going to win the Oscar based on merit alone.

Sure, Moore currently tops Gold Derby’s Best Actress Oscar chart according to the combined predictions of our Experts, Editors and Users and is a shoo-in to win her first statuette on Feb. 22. However, Oscar cynics keep banging the drum that even though she’s going to win because she’s overdue, she doesn’t deserve to win with this performance.

Huh? Where is this narrative coming from? Have these journalists even seen “Still Alice,” or are they all just spewing out the same story because it plays well in print? Oscar season, after all, is a nearly year-long process that requires bloggers to analyze every nook of cranny of each potential race. And once a narrative becomes popular — such as Matthew McConaughey‘s rise last year from surfer dude to serious actor — it’s often the only thing you hear about that contender.

Watch: Julianne Moore (‘Still Alice’) backstage in Critics’ Choice Awards press room

At the end of the day, it may not even matter what my contemporaries think because Moore’s already earned Best Actress kudos from the Golden Globes, Critics’ Choice and SAG Awards for “Still Alice,” showing broad appeal from every part of the industry. Next week is BAFTA, where she has a commanding lead there as well according to Gold Derby’s racetrack odds.

When Moore does win the Oscar for “Still Alice,” I’m worried that we’ll be hearing for years to come that she prevailed because of the overdue factor and not because she gave the year’s best performance. While that saddens me, I gain solace in what an elderly, earpiece-wearing Oscar voter told me a few weeks ago: Moore’s performance “scared” him, but in a good way. I couldn’t agree more.

But here’s what scares me: Moore’s Best Actress victory could be regarded in the future as an Oscar sham.

Oscar record-holder Katharine Hepburn sent a consoling telegram to Audrey Hepburn when she was snubbed for “My Fair Lady” back in 1964: “Don’t worry about not being nominated,” it read. “Someday you’ll get it for a part that doesn’t rate it.”

Katharine Hepburn knew what she was talking about. Back in 1933 she stole the Oscar that Mary Robson should’ve won for her big-hearted performance as Apple Annie in “Lady for a Day.” Hepburn triumphed for her lightweight turn as a bubbling, wannabe actress in “Morning Glory,” probably because voters even back then were suckers for drunk scenes. In later years, academy members were so upset about the recent death of Hepburn’s longtime partner Spencer Tracy that they gave her another undeserved trophy for “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner,” crushing the far-more-deserving Anne Bancroft (“The Graduate”) and Faye Dunaway (“Bonnie and Clyde”). 

Oscar voters are notorious for giving stars undeserved Oscars, usually because they failed to give it to them earlier for the right roles. Many of these victories are outright outrages and embarrassments in Oscar history like Jack Lemmon (“Save the Tiger”), John Wayne (“True Grit”), Elizabeth Taylor (“Butterfield 8”) and Al Pacino (“Scent of a Woman”). Some cynics might say Sandra Bullock (“The Blind Side”), too. Now it looks like Moore’s pending win also runs the risk of being relegated to a future place in that Hall of Shame.

But, thankfully, in Moore’s case, she’ll be winning for the right one. Don’t forget.

Oscars: Complete list of nominations

Make your own Oscars picks now — click here — or scroll down to predict the Best Actress winner using our easy drag-and-drop menu. Best predictions will win $1,000 prize. And the 24 Users with the best scores advance to a team to compete against our Experts and Editors next year. See who’s in our current Top 24 and their early Oscar predictions. Meet the guy who won our contest to predict Oscar nominations this year — and learn how he did it and how you can be our next Gold Derby superstar. Register/log in to your account so you can also compete to predict the BAFTAs, Grammys, “The Walking Dead,” “Celebrity Apprentice” and more.

15 thoughts on “Oscar cynics are wrong: Julianne Moore does deserve to win for ‘Still Alice’

  1. “Gut wrenching” because of her performance or because the character has Alzheimer? I was never a fan of Moore (she exhibits so little screen personality), but even she deserves much better than this dreary role.

  2. Whether a career award collective or that she gave the best performance of this year’s nominees, she is always deserving in my book. Julianne Moore has always been an actor of risk taking and never of vanity. Just look at Boogie Nights (fearless and vulnerable), The Hours (heartbreaking), The End of The Affair (tormented and sexual noir at it’s best)& my personal favorite Far From Heaven (I believed every moment of her character’s sadness, misunderstood and desire to love and be loved) Glorious parts one and all and with other parts like this years still unseen Map to the Stars, The Kids Are Alright, Safe. Julianne has nothing to worry about for being remembered as a worthy accolade for yet another one of her stirring portraits as Still Alice. One of America’s best leading Actresses all around (INMHO) anyway :).

  3. She really deserves it for this and probably will win, but Rosamund Pike was amazing in Gone Girl, there should be a tie in Best Actress.

  4. Julianne Moore pulled off an subtle performance in Still Alice, but she has done over years excellent roles in Safe, Magnolia, Boogie Nights, The End of the Affair, A Single Man, Maps to the Stars and many films. I’ve seen something that in her strongest roles, they all have a strong contemporary litterature vibe, won’t be surprised if she wins because she has the overdue factor, but the better performance is Marion Cotillard in Two Days, One Night. Marion Cotillard is arguably the best actress of her generation, she gives energy into the screen like no other actor whether it’s male or female, we feel the pain of her mental condition, the film says a social commentary about the European Crisis, the importance of solidarity and founding your inner strength in moments of emotional crisis. About the Oscar Sham and Julianne, i don’t think it’s not gonna affect her because she’s always doing amazing performances.

  5. I agree that Julianne deserves this Oscar for Still Alice, but who in their right mind could say that Jack Lemmon did not deserve his own Oscar in 1973? In many ways, Save the Tiger showed him in peak form.

  6. The Best Actress cateogry is famous for giving undeserved Oscars in recent years I’d say.
    1997 – Helen Hunt over Judi Dench
    1998 – Gwyneth Paltrow over Cate Blanchett
    2000 – Julia Roberts over Ellen Burstyn
    2001 – Halle Berry over Sissy Spacek and Judi Dench, and the not nominated Watts.
    2004 – Hilary Swank over Imelda Staunton and the long overdue Annette Benning.
    2005 – Reese Witherspoon over Felicity Huffman.
    2009 – Sandra Bullock over either of the other four nominees.
    2012 – Jennifer Lawrence over the breahtaking Emmanuelle Riva. Honestly every other perfomance nominated that year and even not nominated (Marion Cotillard) were better than Lawrence’s perfomance in such a joke of a ”film”.
    2014 – Julianne Moore over Rosamund Pike probably.
    The Academy does not recognize the best actors of the year, on the most popular ones.

  7. Of late, they often give out the awards to less than deserving performances , many reasons it seems, in that way it is sort of a bogus affair. This year we had the stellar performance of the year by Pike in Gone Girl, and the shocking Cake performance by Aniston wasn’t even nominated!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More News from GoldDerby

Loading