Oscars poll: Viola Davis would have won over Emma Stone say 71% of respondents

We asked if Viola Davis would have won over Emma Stone had she contended up in lead actress and a resounding 71% of you said that she would have prevailed. That was where we thought Davis was going to contend when we launched the prediction center last summer. But in the fall, she decided to drop down to supporting and immediately became the frontrunner in that race.

Oscars announce wrong Best Picture – How did this happen?

Davis won the Tony Award for playing this same part in the 2010 rialto revival of the August Wilson play. For the initial Broadway production of this domestic drama back in 1987, Mary Alice (who originated the role of Rose), won Best Featured Actress in a Play (the equivalent of the supporting category at the Oscars).

Oscars: Complete list of winners (and nominees)

But for the 2010 revival, Davis won the Best Actress in a Play race. While both actresses were billed below the title — which usually signals a supporting performance — in 2010 the administration committee ruled that the role was really a leading one.

Dish the Oscars with Hollywood insiders in our notorious forums

So, the question is whether Davis would have won the Oscar race for Best Actress this year. Vote in our poll below.

5 thoughts on “Oscars poll: Viola Davis would have won over Emma Stone say 71% of respondents

  1. Viola was smart to stay in Supporting, otherwise she would have lost to Emma Stone, AND then Michelle Williams’ shitty, wholly unbelievable performance would have won, and Manchester already won 2 Oscars as it is, which is still 2 too many, in my opinion. 😐

  2. Talk about categorizing, Maybe La La Land should have campaigned itself in the Live Action Short Subjects category. It may have had a better shot at winning. It was definitely short of an original story, great acting and directing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *