Home Forums Movies Did ‘Mommie Dearest’ really deserve Razzie for Worst Picture of the Decade?

Did ‘Mommie Dearest’ really deserve Razzie for Worst Picture of the Decade?

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
Created
2 years ago
Last Reply
10 months ago
18
( +1 hidden )
replies
1020
views
13
users
3
2
2
  • Marcus Dixon
    Keymaster
    Joined:
    Jun 12th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197615

    Looking back on “Mommie Dearet,” I’m surprised that it won so many Razzie Awards. Not just the standard Worst Picture, but also Worst Picture of the Decade and Worst ‘Drama’ of Our First 25 Years. What gives? Did the biopic deserve all those hard knocks or is it a diamond in the rough?

    Reply
    Marcus Dixon
    Keymaster
    Joined:
    Jun 12th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197617

    As a refresher, “Mommie Dearest” won Worst Picture of the 80s, “Showgirls” won Worst Picture of the 90s and “Battlefield Earth” won Worst Picture of the 00s. I can’t find what film won Worst Picture of the 10s … hmm.

    ReplyCopy URL
    KyleBailey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197618

    No! It did not deserve any of its Razzie wins. Yes it’s over the top and campy but that’s what you have to love about it! It is not nearly as bad as Showgirls and DEFINITELY not as awful as Battlefield Earth. And is it as bad as Howard the Duck?! No. It certainly wasn’t the worst movie of the 80’s 

    ReplyCopy URL
    manakamana
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 28th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197619

    Nope. There’s already so little reason for these “awards” to exist, but if you can’t distinguish bad movies from great camp, even 25 years later(?!), you shouldn’t be the group deciding these things (ditto Spice World, helloooo).

    The 80s had PLENTY of its share of poorly made, offensive, and downright dumb movies that aren’t even good enough to be considered camp. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Milk Money
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 2nd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197621

    No and Faye shouldn’t have “won” a razzie for it either. She should have had either Kate’s second or fourth Oscars.

    ReplyCopy URL
    RobertPius
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197622

    Dunaway actually came in  second at the NYFC awards for Best Actress. That was an odd situation. The film became something people loved to make fun of. In actuallity Dunway got some great reviews. Even Pauline Kael loved her.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Eddy Q
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 13th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197623

    ^ Pauline Kael often loved critically panned films while disliking a lot of the acclaimed stuff, without being an self-touting contrarian about it (unlike Armond White). It’s what made her such a great critic, though I still find her opinions of some of Kubrick’s films quite hard to take.

    I’ve never wanted to see Mommie Dearest more than I do now.  

    ReplyCopy URL
    KyleBailey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197624

    I do think the Razzies are great to have but some of their choices can get eye roll worthy. Like anytime a singer does acting does not need to get nominated (Gaga in Machete Kills where she spoke for 2 seconds before being shot at). Though Dunaway wasn’t Oscar worthy by any means, she did not deserve the Razzie. I also don’t think highly of this being their 2nd year in existence so I think they were still trying to find their brand. The 90’s and early 2000’s have a better showcase of the worst of each year. Now it is just who had the most flops in a year or anyone that works with Adam Sandler 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Teridax
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 12th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197625

    I know, myself being a Razzie voter, have tried to explain how Mommie Dearest didn’t deserve any Razzie nominations, let alone wins, yet some of the members just didn’t get it, claiming it “glorifies” child abuse! LOL

    ReplyCopy URL
    Milk Money
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 2nd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197626

    I think if Dunaway would have just gotten that expected Oscar nom over surprise nominee Susan Sarandon, the blow to her career would have been somewhat softened. It’s a brilliant performance. At least it made AFI’s top villains list!

    ReplyCopy URL
    Milo Kunis
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 28th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197627

    Dunaway was never in on the joke. She takes herself far too seriously. It’s a wonder she ever even agreed to the project with that sh*tty script attached to it. Faye refused to even mention the film by name for years, until recently she realized her bank account could use some replenishing, and decided to “write” a book about her experience on the film. And yes, she did believe she would be an Oscar contender. She apparently mentioned it several times on set.

    Speaking of Dunaway — She had the best streak of good luck of any actress in the late 60s to early 70s. She was well on her way to becoming a living legend, and she blew her chance with that attitude, her sense of entitlement, and an alleged narcotics problem. True, she was brilliant when she was on her A Game, but no one was willing to put up with all of her antics to get that final product. She was practically black balled after so long. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    KyleBailey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197628

    I really want her to make a comeback. She is such a fantastic actress that deserved way better 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Teridax
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 12th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197629

    Amen, Kyle Bailey.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Jake
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 2nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197630

    To put it in the words of Blanche Hudson, Joan Crawford’s character on “What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?” about her on-screen sister: “She’s emotionally distrurbed. She’s unbalanced”. That perfectly sums up “Mommie Dearest” – emotionally disturbed and unbalanced. It’s also the most infamous out of the all 1980s winners. But it was way better than “Howard Duck” at least.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Alex Bustillos
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 30th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #197631

    I love this movie and I think Faye deserved more credit than she’s received.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
Reply To: Did ‘Mommie Dearest’ really deserve Razzie for Worst Picture of the Decade?

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
darthva... - Oct 16, 2017
Movies
Wildfor... - Oct 16, 2017
Movies