December 27, 2016 at 2:34 pm #1201975693
I’d say in 1999 she was probably second but I’m not sure about 2004.December 27, 2016 at 2:39 pm #1201975695
I guess Imelda Staunton is the second to Swank in 2004. She won BAFTA. I guess the order is Swank, Staunton, Winslet, Benning, Moreno.
In 1999, she is definitely second.December 27, 2016 at 2:41 pm #1201975699
Second in 1999, no way in hell she was top 3 in 2004 for that dreadful movie.December 27, 2016 at 2:50 pm #1201975704
I am fairly certain she was second in 1999.
I am also fairly certain she was not #2 for “Being Julia” because nobody gives a damn about that movie. Not even its cast or crew. It is as if it never happened.December 27, 2016 at 2:57 pm #1201975708
She must have been second in 2000, no way someone else would have surpassed her.
Not too sure about 2005 (ceremony) neither… on the one hand she took the Comedy Globe and some voters might have felt the need to make up for her loss in “American Beauty” (which prevented another real sweep after “The Silence of the Lambs”). On the other hand, Staunton’s performance and movie were so much more touching. Rooting for Annette this year though…
December 27, 2016 at 3:23 pm #1201975726
- This reply was modified 10 months, 4 weeks ago by cinephile2.
Of course Staunton was second in 2004. It’s a shame she lost, even though I feel like I’m one of the few people that like Swank’s 2nd win just fine. Her entire career surely doesn’t merit 2 Best Actress Oscars but at the same time she won for damn amazing performances.
It will be odd to see Benning lose twice to Swank and then maybe twice to Portman if she’s in for this year.December 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm #1201975728
She was definitely second for American Beauty. No one really cared about Being Julia but I think she was like third.December 27, 2016 at 4:02 pm #1201975766
in 2004 I think Stauton and Winslet were in better position.December 27, 2016 at 4:04 pm #1201975768
She was a definite 2nd for American Beauty, but for Being Julia she was more likely 4th.December 27, 2016 at 5:07 pm #1201975824
She was definitely second in 1999. McTeer most likely was third that year. Benning was either third or fourth for Being Julia- From what I’ve heard, Winslet had very little buzz in 2004 so Benning may have gained more votes given the Globe win and the Benning vs Swank buzz. But Staunton was second in 2004.December 27, 2016 at 5:08 pm #1201975828
Bening was runnerup in 1999/2000, but in 2004 Staunton was the runnerup not her.December 27, 2016 at 5:21 pm #1201975835
She was definitely second in 2000 but there’s no way she was runner-up in 2005. I want to believe that Academy was smart enough to make Imelda Staunton second and losing only by couple of votes. How that performance lost is still beyond me. That’s why I don’t expect Natalie to win this year. The best performances rarely win. And when you give one of the best performances of decade you never win. For me Staunton was the best female leading performance of 00s (alongside Hawkins in HGL, Huppert in The Pianist and such). And Portman is the best female leading performance of 10s (alongside Rampling in 45 Years, Riva in Amour and such). Bening was probably dead last in 2005. Yup, even Catalina Sandino Moreno probably had more votes than her (and deservedly so!).
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.