( +1 hidden )
January 24, 2018 at 7:10 pm #1202477811
Every year everyone already knows who’s getting nominated and who is winning the acting categories What can the academy do to make things interesting?January 24, 2018 at 7:12 pm #1202477815
Preferential ballot in all categoriesJanuary 24, 2018 at 8:20 pm #1202477879
Not having 80000 precursors is probably the only foolproof way to prevent this and fat chance of that ever happeningJanuary 24, 2018 at 10:35 pm #1202477962
Cancel the televised awards.January 24, 2018 at 11:07 pm #1202477994
Being interesting is not in the Oscars’ mission statement, nor should it.January 25, 2018 at 2:52 am #1202478054
Preferential ballot is the key. Imagining last year’s best actress race in a preferential ballot is giving me boner tbh. It would’ve been so exciting with all the #1-2-3 votes between two deserving nominees and Emma Stone.January 25, 2018 at 4:38 am #1202478101
It probably won’t happen but I would love the Oscars to air before all the guild awards. It would make the show more exciting and lessen Oscar season fatigue.January 25, 2018 at 4:44 am #1202478104
Preferential ballot is the answer. Many of the hot young things wouldn’t have won if it was used in the past. Why? I don’t see people who liked Isabelle Huppert putting Emma Stone as #2, she’d definitely be #5. But on the other hand I could see people who wanted to fuck Stone putting Huppert as #2 or #3.January 25, 2018 at 5:34 am #1202478140
There are too many award shows. I honestly see no point in having SAG and Critics Choice. Half of the time, the critics choice winners are not similar to the winners of the minor critic awards.January 25, 2018 at 6:14 am #1202478167
There are too many award shows. I honestly see no point in having SAG and Critics Choice. Half of the time, the critics choice winners are not similar to the winners of the minor critic awards.
In defense of Critics Choice, there is like zero overlap between the membership of, say, the NYFCC and the BFCA. It’s definitely elitist vs. populist.