Home Forums Movies How come Robert Duvall wasn’t nominated for Network

How come Robert Duvall wasn’t nominated for Network

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Created
3 years ago
Last Reply
3 years ago
9
replies
519
views
8
users
2
1
1
  • RobertPius
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185056

    He won a few critics awards. Ned Beatty seemed to get his nomination though. I don’t really get that. Duvall is pretty great. Beatty just has that one big speech which I’m not particularly fond of. 

    Reply
    TomHardys
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 24th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185058

    I’ve thought about this several times and I still can’t understand what happened. Ned Beatty’s character was a plot device. Robert Duvall’s had a beginning, a middle and an end. Very colorful role. I will never understand what happened.

    ReplyCopy URL
    ETPhoneHome
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 3rd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185059

    I still can’t figure that out. Beatty’s performance was much less impactful, but it had a big speech. Strait and Finch won for their big speeches, so maybe they were just in the mood for rewarding speeches.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Gone_Guy
    Member
    Joined:
    Jan 22nd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185060

    Watched this film for the first time about a month ago, and I wondered the same thing. While I loved the movie and am thrilled Faye Dunaway won her Oscar for it, I felt a little differently about contenders in the other categories.

    In Lead Actor, I would have given William Holden the win over Peter Finch.

    In Supporting Actress, I would have given Marlene Warfield a nomination to go along with Beatrice Straight.

    And yes, in Supporting Actor, I would have given Robert DuVall a freaking win before even nominating Ned Beatty.

    DuVall’s snub of a nomination is a true head-scratcher for a film that Oscar embraced with nominations. Sort of reminds me of Robin Wright being left out for Forrest Gump later in the 90s. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Atypical
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 1st, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185061

    Robert Duvall was certainly Oscarworthy for “Network,” though I can see why Ned Beatty’s big speechifying scene sealed up his nomination instead. There could have easily been room for the both of them in this supporting actor field. I’d replace Duvall for either one of “Rocky”‘s nominations here.

    ReplyCopy URL
    BTN
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 11th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185062

    Beatty was great. His speech had a lot of drama but he had a lot of Range and humor in telling his story and telling Howard he’s “meddling with nature”. “You got what I’m saying?” It was an epic scene but not one dimensional. First time I saw network I thought Duvall was just loud and yelling with no nuance.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Gone_Guy
    Member
    Joined:
    Jan 22nd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185063

    Well, even though Robert DuVall was snubbed of a nomination, at least no one ever had to utter the words, “Hey, whatever happened to that DuVall guy?” 

    ReplyCopy URL
    benbraddock
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185064

    Many great performances are over looked in films
    that get multiple oscar nominations..

    Where was???

    Kathleen Turner in The Accidental Tourist
    Shirley MacLaine in Postcards from the Edge
    Sigourney Weaver in The Ice Storm
    Sally Field in Forrest Gump
    Eileen Brennan in The Sting
    John Savage in The Deer Hunter
    Ray Liotta in Good Fellas
    Tim Robbins in Shawshank Redemption
    Lynn Redgrave in Shine
    Chris Cooper in American Beauty
    Christopher Plummer in The Insider
    John Leguizamo in Moulin Rouge

    I suppose a lot of performances have to finish 6th..

    Mr Duvall was one of them…

    ReplyCopy URL
    OnTheAisle
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 19th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185065

    I suspect Robert Duvall’s absence from the roster of Best Supporting Actor nominees has less to do with the Academy voters choosing between Ned Beatty and Duvall but rather choosing between Duvall and Duvall.

    The year was an embarrassment of riches for the actor. While well received in Network, Duvall was more celebrated as Dr. Watson in The Seven Per Cent Solution, nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay. Duvall in a scene stealing supporting role won the majority of film’s acclaim while working with some stellar actors including Oscar winners Vanessa Redgrave, Alan Arkin and Laurence Olivier. In its review of Network, Vincent Canby of the New York Times wrote that Robert Duvall is “fine” in Network but “superb” in The Seven Per Cent Solution.

    Since Academy rules only permit an actor to be nominated for one performance, Duvall’s Best Supporting Actor votes most likely split between the two performances allowing other actors to capture the nominations.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Eddy Q
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 13th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #185066

    Beatty was great. His speech had a lot of drama but he had a lot of Range and humor in telling his story and telling Howard he’s “meddling with nature”. “You got what I’m saying?” It was an epic scene but not one dimensional. First time I saw network I thought Duvall was just loud and yelling with no nuance.

    That’s basically how I feel, and I’m glad someone here agrees. Beatty achieved more with his one scene than Duvall did in the entire film – he find he did little more with his role than what the script demanded. He’s the shoutiest and dullest of the cast. Oscar made the right call here.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
Gabe Gu... - Nov 21, 2017
Movies
Grégor... - Nov 20, 2017
Movies