Home Forums Movies Jack Nicholson’s nominations

Jack Nicholson’s nominations

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)
Created
4 years ago
Last Reply
4 years ago
39
replies
1143
views
19
users
babypook
11
Words Count
4
Atypical
2
  • dinasztie
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 5th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150198

    We surely talk a LOT about the Queen of the Oscars, Meryl Streep, but not as much about the King, Jack Nicholson.* I don’t think I would give more Oscar wins to anyone than Jack, who is my favorite actor (along with Dusting Hoffman and Jack Lemmon). He’s the embodiment of greatness in film (AND method acting): he gets into every role so brilliantly that it’s hard to believe he’s not playing himself. Of course, there’s a touch of Jack everywhere but I feel that his cool personality only works in his favor, and makes him look as if these performances keep flowing out of him without any effort. That’s the definition of a true master for me. So let’s see his nominations. I indicate my wins for him with *s. 

    1969: Easy Rider (Gig Young was an amazing winner, I love that movie too much)
    1970: Five Easy Pieces (it’s a very tight race with Scott, but that performance is too legendary)
    1973: The Last Detail (he’s amazing so it’s kind of painful not to give him the win)
    1974: Chinatown* (every second is legendary) 
    1975: One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest* (the most frightening and charismatic sociopath ever, what a brilliant, deceptive performance)
    1981: Reds (Sir John Gielgud edges him out only barely for me)
    1983: Terms of Endearment (easy to see why he won, but it’s my least favorite win of his, Sam Shepard is my pick)
    1985: Prizzi’s Honor (usually considered terrible, but I’m OK with this nomination, even if it’s not his best, it’s interesting) 
    1987: Ironweed* (oh boy, this is his most underrated performance, just astonishing)
    1992: A Few Good Men (I’m fine with him here, a bit too 90s movie for me, though, not really Oscar-material for me) 
    1997: As Good as It Gets* (hilarious and touching, beautiful acting)
    2002: About Schmidt* (a true crowning achievement of his career, I adore The Pianist, but there’s no doubt in my mind that Jack should have won)

    That’s 5 out of 12 for me. 😀 Although it might seem like I’m a crazy fan and I am, I totally base that on my admiration for his performances, not the other way around. 

    *Before anyone starts bitching about them being movie royalty, I’m considering the Oscars only (even though I find them two of the greatest performers ever) 

    Reply
    babypook
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150200

    Agreed!

    It’s easy adding others

    The Departed (to hell with the reviews)

    The Witches of Eastwick (delicously overthetop Jack, and speaking of Pfeiffer)

    The Shining (ditto, and thanks, “Johnny”)

    The Crossing Guard

    The Two Jakes (what a great “pig” he is here)

    Wolf (speaking of Pfeiffer….)

    Batman (best villain imo….or at least tied with Heath)

    Carnal Knowledge

    The King of Marvin Gardens

    Truly one of the best thespians around.

    ReplyCopy URL
    vinny
    Participant
    Joined:
    May 20th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150201

    The Academy got it right every time with him in my opinion.

    ReplyCopy URL
    KT
    Member
    Joined:
    Sep 20th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150202

    He doesn’t do it often on television or on camera, but I encourage anyone who’s a fan of his work to look for his videos, speaking about roles.  He had so much interesting insight about the Joker in Batman—really, Jack is a thinker and it shows in his work.  And his talk intro-ing Cuckoo’s Nest for AFI is a hoot!

    I loved the conversation Spielberg had with Kubrick, which the former recounts, when Kubrick totally shut Spieberg down when he said he thought Jack was bad in The Shining.  That is an Oscar nomination worthy performance.

    His nomination total isn’t overblown like Meryl’s.  The work is strong, the films are strong, many of them being classics that people continue to revisit. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Beau S.
    Member
    Joined:
    Feb 10th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150203

    Great actor. The only nomination he received that I disagree with is As
    Good As it Gets (one of the few Brooks films I dislike). The
    nominations/wins I would have given him:

    1969: Nominated – Best Supporting Actor, Easy Rider
    1970: Nominated – Best Actor, Five Easy Pieces
    1971: Nominated – Best Actor, Carnal Knowledge
    1973: Won – Best Actor, The Last Detail (his greatest screen performance by a huge margin imo)
    1974: Nominated – Best Actor, Chinatown
    1975: Nominated – Best Actor, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
    1980: Nominated – Best Actor, The Shining
    1981: Nominated – Best Supporting Actor, Reds
    1983: Nominated – Best Supporting Actor, Terms of Endearment
    1985: Nominated – Best Actor, Prizzi’s Honor
    1987:
    Won – Best Actor, Ironweed (his second-best screen performance, hugely
    underrated, Douglas should have won for Wonder Boys)
    1989: Nominated – Best Supporting Actor, Batman
    1992: Nominated – Best Supporting Actor, A Few Good Men
    2002: Won – Best Actor, About Schmidt (need to see competition again though)
    2006: Nominated – Best Supporting Actor, The Departed (how the HELL did Wahlberg get this nomination instead of him?)

    15 nominations, 2 wins

    ReplyCopy URL
    ETPhoneHome
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 3rd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150204

    He’s one of my favourites, based on what I’ve seen from him, which is not even all of his nominated performances. He really is the Oscar King, and deservedly so. I don’t know if I would have given him more than 3 oscars, because I support spreading the wealth, but I would have preffered for him to have won for About Schmidt than for As Good as it Gets. One of his best performances was in A Few Good Men, but that category was absolutely packed with worthy performances, so I can’t pick him to win there.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Emmys2011
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 29th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150205

    Honestly I have not seen half his nominated performances, but all his wins are incredibly deserving and I might even add a couple that didn´t win.

    Also, I hate he wasn´t nominated for the shinning, probably one of his most iconic and enduring performances ever (probably the performance that will most be remembered in the future by the mainstream audience). And the departed, even more so because wahlberg got in…WAHLBERG (tha f*******K?)

    ReplyCopy URL
    babypook
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150206

    Poor Mark. I found him worthy of his nomination.

    So many dumb assed, biasedagainstgenre snubs to The Shining. At least the Saturns honoured Scatman and Stanley. Also posthumously for Bela Bartok. That music gives me goosebumps every time.

    ReplyCopy URL
    BenitoDelicias
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 3rd, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150207

    It’s amazing that Wahlberg got in for The Departed, terrific nomination. Jack deserved his nomination too, don’t know how he missed on that one. Maybe the Leo talk in supporting also hurt him. 

    I hate his performance in Prizzi’s Honor. He was still rewarded for it at other awards and critic’s groups, ridiculous.

    About Schmidt…. I absolutely love the movie and Jack in it, it would have been such a deserving win, but that year was just so difficult with him, Day Lewis and the sudden Brody win which was also very much deserved.  

    ReplyCopy URL
    Beau S.
    Member
    Joined:
    Feb 10th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150208

    Don’t get me wrong; I thought Wahlberg was terrific in The Departed. I’m just surprised he was able to get the nod over Jack.

    If you had told me that only one actor would get a nomination for The Departed, I would have thought Wahlberg to be third in line.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Madson Melo
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 25th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150209

    Overrated by academy, and all of his 3 Oscars were underseved.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Halo_Insider
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 3rd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150210

    Poor Mark. I found him worthy of his nomination.

    So many dumb assed, biasedagainstgenre snubs to The Shining. At least the Saturns honoured Scatman and Stanley. Also posthumously for Bela Bartok. That music gives me goosebumps every time.

    That Razzie nom for Kubrick just comes off as so random when I look at from today’s perspective. Weird.

    I love Jack, and support the majority of his nominations, maybe removing only Prizzi’s Honor and As Good As It Gets (haven’t seen Ironweed. That said, I’m not sure if I have him winning for anything but Cuckoo’s Nest (also haven’t seen Last Detail). Maybe Reds? He’s great in Easy Rider, but apparently that would have been the year Once Upon a Time in the West was eligible, and I’m partial to Jason Robards. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    benbraddock
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150211

    In my Oscar book. this is how Jack stacks up!!!

    1969  EASY RIDER  – sup………Gig Young easily the best
    1970  CARNAL KNOWLEDGE  lead….losing to Hoffman in Little Big Man
    1971  FIVE EASY PIECES  lead….close but losing to Malcom McDowell in A Clockwork orange
    1973  THE LAST DETAIL..lead….losing to Pacino in Serpico
    1974  CHINATOWN..lead….great performance by my win was Pacino again in Godfather II
    1975  CUCKOO’S NEST…lead…one of the all time greatest male performances…WINNER
    1980  THE SHINING..lead…great year for actors…losing to DeNiro for his iconic raging Bull
    1981  REDS..sup.   easily the  winner over Gielgud
    1983  TERMS OF ENDEARMENT..in my book he is lead here, daniels supporting…easily the  winner over Duvall
    1985  PRIZZI’S HONOR  lead…I loved this performance but William hurt easily the winner
    1987  IRONWEED lead..great performance, probably his 2nd best ever and easily a winner over Douglas
    1989  BATMAN…sup…another iconic Nicholson performance  ..my choice was James Spader in Sex, Lies and Videotape
    1992  A FEW GOOD MEN- sup…..loved the performance and i have him the winner over Hackman
    1997  AS GOOD AS IT GETS…lead…easily the winner
    2002  ABOUT SCHMIDT-  lead…I have  DDL as the winner for gangs
    2003  SOMETHING’S GOTTA GIVE–lead…almost matched Keaton with his brilliance in comedy…Ben Kingsley in HOSAF my winner
    2006  THE DEPARTED   sup… shouldve made the cut..i have Jackie Earle Haley for Little Children as my winner

    17 NOMINATIONS   AND  6 WINS!!!!
     Oscar  King!!!

    ReplyCopy URL
    Anonymous
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150212


    Where were all of you Ironweed
    fans in 1988 when I sat in a move theater in Los Angeles and the audience made
    a steady stream out the exit doors as the film played and left me alone on the
    aisle by the time the credits ran? The common consensus then was that the
    Pulitzer Prize winning novel was not well served by director Hector Babenco.




    Reviews were not enthusiastic about Nicholson either.




    Hal Hinson wrote in the Washington
    Post
    , “Nicholson, in particular, is a disappointment. In The Witches of Eastwick, he was doing
    Jack, and he did it for all time. And so there was reason to believe that doing
    Jack was behind him, that he would reach inside himself to find fresh,
    unexplored areas of his talent. Nicholson hasn’t played it safe here; he isn’t
    simply doing Jack. Instead, he’s diminished all of his natural magnetism
    without discovering anything to put in its place. He hasn’t become a deeper
    actor, merely a duller one.




    Janet Maslin wrote in the New York Times, “As
    Francis Phelan, Jack Nicholson seems seldom to move, except in flashbacks that
    show Francis as a younger man. It’s a fine performance, very true to the
    burned-out quality of a man confronting his own failures, but the overall
    effect is unavoidably glum.”




    Dave Kerr wrote in the Chicago
    Tribune
    , “
    Nicholson
    doesn`t disgrace himself, and even adds a few brief flickers of wit here and
    there, though there isn`t much he or anyone can do when the scenes run as hoary
    as a tearful confession at his infant son`s graveside.”




    In
    the Los Angeles Times review, Sheila
    Benson, concludes her review calling the five major performances “shattering,” wrote
    a single sentence in regards to Nicholson’s work, “
    Nicholson’s performance doesn’t whimper for our
    approval, and it carries some of the intensely ironic Irish humor that runs in
    a vein through the book.”




    As I recall at the time, Nicholson’s nomination was a complete surprise.
    Most expected the Best Actor nomination to go to Mickey Rourke for the other
    literature-based film on alcoholism, Barfly


    ReplyCopy URL
    GhostOrchid
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 27th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #150213

    Oh wow, I’ve only seen 6 out of 12 (including his three wins), that means half of them. What a shame, I need to see the other six asap.

    I’ve seen

    Chinatown
    One flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest
    Tears of Endearment
    Ironweed
    As Good as it gets
    About Schmidt

    I’m fine with his wins for One flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest and As Good as it gets. I’m not so found of his Tears of Endearment win because I’m not found of that film in general (safe for Shirley MacLaine’s performance).
    He was so goddamn creepy in The Shinig. So iconic.
    Ironweed is an incredible hard film to watch. Just depressing and so very very long. But he was great in it. So was Meryl in her (supporting) role. Her out of nowhere nomination (not even a Globe nod!) was more surprising that year than his.
    They had great chemistry together in Heartburn a year earlier. That movie not (Academy) awardsworthy, though personally I’d givem them both a nom for a Comedy Globe (yes, it felt pretty much comedy to me).
    Two favorites of mine are also The Witches of Eastwick and Wolf.
    I still preffer Nicholson overall as the Joker, if I had to choose between him or Heath Ledger. The latter really richly deserved his Oscar for his psycho performance, but I found Nicholsons mixture of an “old fashioned” gangster and psycho more entertaining than just “pure” psycho. He was wonderful quiet in About Schmidt and so overly funny and great with Diane Keaton in Something’s gotta give.
    And he should have been nominated for The Departed. Why he was not…. I still don’t know. 

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)
Reply To: Jack Nicholson’s nominations

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
GermanG... - Dec 14, 2017
Movies
John Sm... - Dec 13, 2017
Movies