Les Misérables – Part Deux

Home // Forums // Movies // Les Misérables – Part Deux

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 264 total)

This topic contains 263 replies, has 264 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Bride of Satan Carbon Based Lifeform 3 years, 7 months ago.

  • Profile photo of Bride of SatanCarbon Based Lifeform
    Participant
    Joined
    Jun 20th, 2011
    Total Topics
    10
    Posts
    3037
    #78180

    S’il vous plaît continuer…

    Reply
    Profile photo of Bride of SatanCarbon Based Lifeform
    Participant
    Joined
    Jun 20th, 2011
    Total Topics
    10
    Posts
    3037
    #78182
    Reply
    Profile photo of Bride of SatanCarbon Based Lifeform
    Participant
    Joined
    Jun 20th, 2011
    Total Topics
    10
    Posts
    3037
    #78183
    Reply
    Profile photo of Bride of SatanCarbon Based Lifeform
    Participant
    Joined
    Jun 20th, 2011
    Total Topics
    10
    Posts
    3037
    #78184
    Reply
    Profile photo of Bride of SatanCarbon Based Lifeform
    Participant
    Joined
    Jun 20th, 2011
    Total Topics
    10
    Posts
    3037
    #78185
    Reply
    Profile photo of Eddie ABamaEd
    Participant
    Joined
    Nov 3rd, 2010
    Total Topics
    15
    Posts
    1178
    #78186

    Wow, Lisa’s review was not kind. It did sound like she went into it with a bit of a pre-disposition. There was some actual criticism buried in it though and directed at Hooper. It will be interesting to see the public response to the movie.

    Reply
    Profile photo of Ryan A AguirreGuilty of Being Innocent
    Member
    Joined
    Nov 17th, 2010
    Total Topics
    2
    Posts
    48
    #78187

    Les Mis is following this Nine-ish trajectory (big buzz that fades really fast), and Hooper’s lack of a Globe nod (from a group that traditionally beats off to musicals) is kind of telling. Although Les Mis is a much, much better movie than that piece of crap.

    Reply
    Profile photo of Freddy AlmonteFreddy Almonte
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 17th, 2011
    Total Topics
    0
    Posts
    98
    #78188

    The lack of Directing nod hurt Les Miz much more than the review, I just hope that if Les Miz doesn’t win the BP Oscar then Lincoln does.

    Reply
    JackO
    Participant
    Joined
    Jun 2nd, 2011
    Total Topics
    4
    Posts
    1390
    #78189

    Les Mis is dead on the water

    Reply
    Profile photo of teribabypook
    Participant
    Joined
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Total Topics
    106
    Posts
    13893
    #78190

    Les Mis is dead on the water

    Is it?

    For anyone interested, TCM has three different film versions of Les Mis airing today. Fyi

    Reply
    Profile photo of ScottfergusonScottferguson
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 26th, 2011
    Total Topics
    119
    Posts
    11203
    #78191

    It is dead in terms of having any realistic chance of winning BP, unless the reviews miraculously turn around, the public makes it a big hit (which hardly helped Mamma Mia) and Academy members reacted vastly differently than critics, for which to this degree there is no precedent.
    Again, the nail in the coffin is preferential voting. If there were five nominees, most votes win as was previously done, and it was an incredibly close race among all five, it might have had a slight chance – if it got nominated. Under this system, that won’t happen. 

    Reply
    Profile photo of Adam B.adamunc
    Participant
    Joined
    Jul 5th, 2011
    Total Topics
    47
    Posts
    2562
    #78192

    Wow, Lisa’s review was not kind. It did sound like she went into it with a bit of a pre-disposition. There was some actual criticism buried in it though and directed at Hooper. It will be interesting to see the public response to the movie.

    It’s got a 7.8 on IMDB now from over 2300 users. There’s a good possibility the film will repeat the trajectory of the stage production, which received lukewarm reviews but was very quickly made a popular success by word-of-mouth. It’s an audience piece, for sure.

    What’s interesting is that the reviews of British vs. American critics for the film are of the opposite tone than from the stage production. Original London reviews for the stage production were negative, while it was much better-received in New York, including getting a very positive review from Frank Rich (aka “The Butcher of Broadway”) in the Times. Conversely, for the film, the British press seems much more positive than the American.

    Reply
    Profile photo of Nate WadeSmileynate
    Participant
    Joined
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Total Topics
    3
    Posts
    376
    #78193

    Here’s my take on the film.   It has a pre-sold audience….much bigger than “Nine” did so I don’t think that’s a fair comparison.  People who love “Les Mis” really LOVE “Les Mis” and if the actors are good and the songs are there, they’re going to be happy.  As mentioned before, this seems to be on a similar critical trajectory to the original reviews for the show, and we know how that turned out.  No matter what, it’s going to open big- it’s like “Twilight” for musical theatre geeks.  What it does after that box-office wise, we won’t know until audience reaction hits.  I think unless the movie completely desecrates on people’s fondness and memories of the musical, it’s going to get good word of mouth.

    As for Oscar, if it wins, great.  If it doesn’t, no biggie.  As long as it entertains me and I get my $9 worth (I’m seeing it in LA, so maybe more!), I’m happy.  I would love Anne Hathaway and Hugh Jackman to be nominated, but at this point that is just based on my admiration of these two as actors and performers, with a confidence in their abilities.  

    I will say though that some of the poor reviews seem less artistically critical and more just a chance to take swipes.  I usually like Schwartzbaum, for example, but man, she seemed angry at the movie.  Which is weird, but oh well.

    Reply
    Profile photo of Ryan A AguirreGuilty of Being Innocent
    Member
    Joined
    Nov 17th, 2010
    Total Topics
    2
    Posts
    48
    #78194

    [quote=”BamaEd”]Wow, Lisa’s review was not kind. It did sound like she went into it with a bit of a pre-disposition. There was some actual criticism buried in it though and directed at Hooper. It will be interesting to see the public response to the movie.

    It’s got a 7.8 on IMDB now from over 2300 users. There’s a good possibility the film will repeat the trajectory of the stage production, which received lukewarm reviews but was very quickly made a popular success by word-of-mouth. It’s an audience piece, for sure.

    What’s interesting is that the reviews of British vs. American critics for the film are of the opposite tone than from the stage production. Original London reviews for the stage production were negative, while it was much better-received in New York, including getting a very positive review from Frank Rich (aka “The Butcher of Broadway”) in the Times. Conversely, for the film, the British press seems much more positive than the American.[/quote]

    ….The problem with that iMDB rating is that most people haven’t even seen it yet… 

    Reply
    Profile photo of ScottfergusonScottferguson
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 26th, 2011
    Total Topics
    119
    Posts
    11203
    #78195

    And the film was heavily screened for people who were likely to love it.

    IMDb ratings before a film opens are pretty worthless.   

    Reply
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 264 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.