Home Forums Movies Oscars outrage: Who gave the WORST Best Actress performance?

Oscars outrage: Who gave the WORST Best Actress performance?

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 87 total)
Created
2 years ago
Last Reply
2 years ago
89
( +4 hidden )
replies
9962
views
37
users
11
8
7
  • Paul Sheehan
    Keymaster
    Joined:
    May 14th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188832

    For me, this is a no-brainer: Natalie Portman in “Black Swan” waltzed off with the award because we were all fooled into thinking she did most of the dancing. That her overwrought acting won over Oscar voters makes me question their taste in talent.

    Her over-the-top performance edged out finely-tuned turns by a previous Oscar champ (Nicole Kidman, “Rabbit Hole”) and two past nominees — Annette Bening (“The Kids Are All Right”) and Michelle Willams (“Blue Valentine”) — as well as newcomer Jennifer Lawrence (“Winter’s Bone”). 

    Reply
    Tye-Grr
    Member
    Joined:
    Nov 5th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188834

    ^Ooooof, I completely disgaree. I think Portman’s is one of the best wins in this category, a performance that to me has gotten even better with repeat viewings. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    M
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 5th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188835

    Cher beating her fellow nominees. Jodie Foster beating Glenn Close. Marlee Matlin beating Sigourney Weaver. Jennifer Lawrence beating Jessica Chastain. Hilary Swank’s second Oscar. McDormand beating Blethyn.

    ReplyCopy URL
    ETPhoneHome
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 3rd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188836

    I’m probably going to get some hate for this, but I really can’t understand how Cher won for Moonstruck. Hunter or Close would have been far more deserving than her for the totally stilted delivery of her lines, and ludicrous overacting. I get that it’s part of the charm of the film that the acting is absurd, but I don’t think it should be considered even remotely Oscar-worthy.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Halo_Insider
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 3rd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188837

    Wow, Paul. We’ve had some peculiar opinions around these parts, but that is one gauntlet-throwing outlier of an opinion if I’ve ever read one. Completely disagree.

    I think if you’re talking about “questions in taste”, you don’t have to look any further than the winner from the year before. I like Sandra Bullock in a lot of things (including Gravity), but woof. I just cannot get behind The Blind Side as an Oscar-contending film, even taking into account how big a year 2009 was for her commercially.

    I think even with some of the other maligned Best Actress winners (Paltrow, Roberts, Cher), I’ve actually enjoyed their performances and the films themselves. But, I really don’t like The Blind Side, and I don’t think even Sandy could elevate it enough. She was charming as hell on the awards circuit, so at least that was nice.

    That said, there are also a whole lot of pre-1980 Best Actress winners that I haven’t caught.

    ReplyCopy URL
    twenty
    Participant
    Joined:
    Mar 21st, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188838

    I love Portman’s performance but somehow feel the excellent cinematography made everthing apper more complex(and attractive) than it actually was.
    As for worst, I think in recent years no win was really bad.
    Sandy wasn’t great given her competition.
    Hilliary was excellent but the competition was tough (would have given it to Winslet, Imelda Staunton or maybe not).
    Burstyn vs Roberts (Burstyn)

    Blanchett over Gwyneth
    Paltrow

    ReplyCopy URL
    KyleBailey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188839

    Ugh Kate Winslet in The Reader. I wanted to claw my eyes out and still want to over the fact she beat Meryl for Doubt and Angelina Jolie for Changeling (LET THE HATERS BEGIN) 

    ReplyCopy URL
    JOHN
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 24th, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188840

    To name a few: 

    Cher for Moonstruck

    Sandra Bullock for The BlindSide

    Jennifer Lawrence for Silver Linings Playbook

    Gwenyth Paltrow for Shakespeare in Love

    Reese Witherspoon for Walk the Line

    Nicole Kidman for The Hours 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Atypical
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 1st, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188841

    Natalie Portman’s Oscar win for “Black Swan” was one of the best the Academy has thought to bestow, and at least top three calibre in the past ten years of this category.

    ReplyCopy URL
    FilmGuy619
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 13th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188842

    Probably Gwyneth Paltrow for Shakespeare In Love. I haven’t even seen Cate Blanchett in Elizabeth, who almost everything thinks should’ve won, but I certainly didn’t see an awards caliber performance from Paltrow. She was fine but any actress could’ve done that role justice. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    M
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 5th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188843

    I will defend Paltrow. Although I too was upset initially at her win. With time I have come to appreciate her performance and win. Blanchett is a Streepian level juggernaut with 2 wins and 6 nominations and counting. Cate will win Best Actress again putting her in the company of Streep and Bergman.

    ReplyCopy URL
    tonorlo
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 4th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188844

    There are definitely a handful of winners over the years who aren’t agressively bad, per se, but shouldn’t have gotten anywhere close to an Oscar. For me, the all-time worst offender is Loretta Young’s buttoned-up, bland and nearly anonymous Swedish housekeeper-turned-Congressional candidate in the otherwise harmless dandelion puff that is “The Farmer’s Daughter.” There’s only one truly great moment in the performance, and it comes far too early for its own good- a lecherous “Samaritan” offers Young a lift, only to have his car “break down” in front of a motel. Young gets a vivid closeup where the naive farm girl shows she’s onto the scheme, and quietly knocks the engine back into gear. It is literally the only moment in the performance where I can catch a breath of something that might have seduced an Oscar voter. Beyond that, nothing.

    And for the record, I found Portman far and away the weakest link of her lineup that year (I oscillate between Kidman and Williams for the win, although Lawrence gives a very sturdy account of herself in “Winter’s Bone.”)

    ReplyCopy URL
    ENGLAND
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 5th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188845

    First, I will like to say that I do not see how some can consider Natalie Portman performance in Black Swan as one of the best. I’m sorry but Barbra Hershey stood out for me. The idea was great and so was the dancing but the acting was nothing to brag about. I think Kiera Knightley would have done a better job. As for some winners I do not agree with, id say…

    • Sandra Bullock 2009: Un-nominated Shohreh Aghdashloo (The Stoning of Soraya M.)
    • Gwenyth Paltrow 1998: Cate Blanchett (Elizabeth)
    • Nicole Kidman 2002: Julianne Moore (Far From Heaven)
    • Jodie Foster 1988: Glenn Close (Dangerous Liaisons) or Meryl Streep (A Cry in the Dark)
    • Cher 1987: Glenn Close (Fatal Attraction)

    **** The Absolute worst is Louise Fletcher in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. By far the worst win. She did absolutely nothing. People only praise her because of the film itself.

    ReplyCopy URL
    JOHN
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 24th, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188846

    ^Ooooof, I completely disgaree. I think Portman’s is one of the best wins in this category, a performance that to me has gotten even better with repeat viewings. 

    I also think Natalie portman’s performance in Black Swan is one of the best, along with Charlize Theron in Monster and Marion Cotillard in LA Vie en Rose.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Patrick
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 18th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188847

    The only performance that I think was truly terrible (not just undeserved) was Gwyneth Paltrow for “Shakespeare in Love.” She also gets worst acceptance speech for that insulting sobbing mess in which she insinuated that her and her fellow nominees were not worthy of a win if they’re nominated against Meryl (It’s true but why allude to that? Everyone’s already thinking it).

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 87 total)
Reply To: Oscars outrage: Who gave the WORST Best Actress performance?

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
darthva... - Oct 16, 2017
Movies
Wildfor... - Oct 16, 2017
Movies