Home Forums Movies Oscars outrage: Who gave the WORST Best Supporting Actor performance?

Oscars outrage: Who gave the WORST Best Supporting Actor performance?

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
Created
2 years ago
Last Reply
2 years ago
15
replies
941
views
15
users
1
1
1
  • Paul Sheehan
    Keymaster
    Joined:
    May 14th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188966

    Oh, boy — talk about being spoiled for choice as to the worst of the best. 

    I could go all the way back to the very first winner, Walter Brennan, who won the first of his record three Oscars in this category for “Come and Get It” in 1936. I would rather leave it, if you don’t mind.

    Then again, there is that slew of old codgers to consider who have won this award as a defacto lifetime achievement award including George Burns (“The Sunshine Boys”), Don Ameche (“Cocoon”) and Jack Palance (“City Slickers”).

    But in the end, I think Javier Bardem gave the most mediorcre performance of the lot in “No Country for Old Men.” His Buster Brown haircut was the most interesting thing about his portrayl of a heartless hitman in this overrated film. 

    Who do you think pulled the wool over the eyes of Oscar voters? 

     

    Reply
    M
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 5th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188968

    Waltz and Caine for their second Oscars.

    ReplyCopy URL
    twenty
    Participant
    Joined:
    Mar 21st, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188969

    Jim Broadbent over Ian McKellen
    Alan Arkin over Djimon Hounsou
    Tommy Lee Jones over Ralph Fiennes (or Leo)

    ReplyCopy URL
    Jose Manuel Garcia
    Participant
    Joined:
    May 16th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188970

    First of all, I strongly disagree with your pick on Bardem. He created an unique character. His english was flawless… many friends from the US didnt know that he was from my own country. 

    About who i consider the worst of the worst… I will go with John Mills for Ryan´s Daughter. That was a really dumb choice. He just played the silly character that they usually gave the award. Second quite close Don Ameche for Coocoon…. and i know many here like his peformance, but Joe Pecsi was too over the top for me. Maybe his character didnt help me to like his performance, or maybe the film bored me to death… 

    ReplyCopy URL
    tonorlo
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 4th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188971

    This category is rife with less-than-sterling winners, but far and away, my vote would have to go to George Chakiris. Yes, his film was a juggernaut. Yes, for two and a half minutes, he was a near-compelling Cinderella story. And YES, all four of his co-nominees deserved the trophy more. Dancing and posturing doth not an Oscar-caliber performance make, and the frightening thing is that Mikhail Baryshnikov got nominated for this EXACT SAME performance 16 years later (eerily, for another wildly erratic, overheated paean to the theatre that also managed to get a slightly inexpicable 11 nominations).

    ReplyCopy URL
    Atypical
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 1st, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188972

    There’s a lot to name in this field: Don Ameche, George Chakiris, Alan Arkin, George Burns, Anthony Quinn, etc. The “old codger” lifetime achievement awards rarely feel earned here (Ameche in particular is just a whole lot of nothing), and only a few times did I feel like they were really deserving. James Coburn was on fire in “Affliction,” and I was quite moved by Christopher Plummer’s role in “Beginners.” Another one I don’t think has aged all that well is George Clooneys’ win in “Syriana.” I know it was his big year and all, but I’ve seen him so much better in roles before and since. He has “Good Night, and Good Luck” to thank in large part for his milestone.

    Going after Javier Bardem is pretty ballsy. He’s one of the most well-regarded Oscar winners in the past ten years in any category (at least). I’m sensing a pattern here with this and Natalie Portman in the best actress thread. :-I

    I want to see if John Mills is as awful as I’ve heard he is for “Ryan’s Daughter.” I can’t bring myself to watch three and a half hours of nonsense, even if it is readily available for viewing. I’ll try to gear myself up for it one of these days.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Emmys2011
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 29th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188973

    The first to pop on my mind is Alan Arkin. He´s not bad at all, but didn´t even deserve a nomination.

    I still don´t understand Tommy Lee Jones in The Fugitive. Absolutely nothing special.

    I also gotta say that CHristopher Plummer is good In Begginers, but I don´t care for that win, thought that was a forgettable year for the catedory, so that´s fine. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    M H
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 7th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188974

    Chakiris and Palance are easy mentions. Robin Williams too, IMO. 

    The worst for me though is Barry Fitzgerald in “Going My Way.” Just nothing there, in the film or the performance.  

    ReplyCopy URL
    FilmGuy619
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 13th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188975

    For me, it’s Cuba Gooding, Jr. Sure, he has that famous line “Show me the money” and all, but his work was so sporadic and without nuance. Ed Norton got hosed. I would also say William H. Macy was, but I like to pretend he is in the lead category. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    KyleBailey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188976

    Oh god Cuba Gooding Jr. hands down. This isn’t a category filled with terrible winners just more “what the hell did they do in that movie to win them an Oscar”. Those would be: 

    Cuba
    Don Ameche “Cocoon”
    George Clooney “Syriana”
    Tim Robbins “Mystic River”
    Benicia del Toro “Traffic”
    Gene Hackman “Unforgiven”
    Jack Palance “City Slickers”
    Melvyn Douglas “Being There” 
    Jason Robards “Julia” 
    Ben Johnson “The Last Picture Show”
    Walter Matthau “The Fortune Cookie” 
     
    More head scratchers than anything. Most of them did perfectly fine jobs but never blew me away  

    ReplyCopy URL
    ENGLAND
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 5th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188977

    Waltz for his second Oscar for Django Unchained. I thought Leo and Sam Jackson were much more worthy of a nod/win and I am not much of a Leo fan.

    ReplyCopy URL
    CanadianFan
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 23rd, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188978

    Christopher Plummer did nothing Oscar-worthy in ‘Beginners’.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Halo_Insider
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 3rd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188979

    Javier Bardem?!?!?! Dear gosh, Paul. I’m scared to think about what your Worst Supporting Actress Winner is.

    For my pick, it’s hard to say. I actually really enjoy City Slickers, but I also never quite got Jack Palance’s victory. He has a nice presence, but he just isn’t given that much to do. I guess my overall choice is a tie between Chakiris and Cuba, with each beating far worthier competition (Clift and Norton, respectively) by relying on the energy of their characters.

    That said, I still haven’t seen Mills or Ameche.

    ReplyCopy URL
    OnTheAisle
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 19th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188980

    WALTER BRENNAN

    Three of the first five Best Supporting Actors Oscars awarded went to Walter Brennan. Brennan was a WWI veteran whose vocal chords were damaged by poison gas. Early in his career, an on set accident cost him his teeth. When he removed his dentures, his visage significantly changed. This allowed the relatively young actor to play old men with stunning accuracy. However, Brennan was also rose from the core of extras who were allowed to vote during this early period in Oscar history. It was widely perceived that this large voting block of extras were voting for one of their own, influenced the three wins for Brennan, and ultimately prompted a shift in who voted for the Oscar.

     

    (reprint from an earlier post)

    ReplyCopy URL
    Asgaroth
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 1st, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #188981

    It’s got to be Alan Arkin in Little Miss Sunshine. The man did absolutely nothing special in that movie to deserve the award, let alone the nomination.

    Then I guess Michael Caine in Cider House Rules, he wasn’t bad but all the other nominees were far more deserving. Wasted award. 

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
Reply To: Oscars outrage: Who gave the WORST Best Supporting Actor performance?

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
Hunter-ish - Oct 20, 2017
Movies
OnTheAisle - Oct 20, 2017
Movies