Home Forums Movies Was Ordinary People correctly cast?

Was Ordinary People correctly cast?

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Created
2 years ago
Last Reply
2 years ago
6
replies
867
views
6
users
1
1
1
  • OnTheAisle
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 19th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #198237

    In an interview in the present issue of Entertainment Weekly, Donald Sutherland reveals that Director Robert Redford had the casting of Ordinary People‘s WASP parents down to Donald Sutherland and Mary Tyler Moore or Gene Hackman and Angie Dickinson.

    Hackman has stated in earlier interviews that he declined the opportunity to star in the 1980 Best Picture winner due to a failure of Paramont to meet his salary demands. He appeared in Superman II that year. Some speculate that Paramont purposefully sabotaged the negotiations with Hackman, because the studio was openly pressuring Redford to take the role.

    Do you think Hackman and Dickinson would have been a better casting choice as Calvin and Beth Jarrett?

    Reply
    vinny
    Participant
    Joined:
    May 20th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #198239

    Ihappy it was not Hackman but now knowing that Dickinson could have been in the movie makes me wonder if she would have been good in the role of Beth.

    ReplyCopy URL
    babypook
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #198240

    Well, Hackman, imo, is great in everything. Dickinson? I’d call her “OK” . Mary Tyler Moore, is a revelation here.

    But, keep Sutherland. Please. And give him an Oscar nod for chrissakes…..

    ReplyCopy URL
    keithw
    Member
    Joined:
    Dec 30th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #198241

    I think it was correctly cast.  Mary Tyler Moore was so good….as was everyone else.  

    ReplyCopy URL
    Cheshire
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 16th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #198242

    Considering how great Donald and Mary are in the movie (I thought they were great). I would say this movie was cast correctly.

    ReplyCopy URL
    K-Hole
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #198243

    Do you think Hackman and Dickinson would have been a better casting choice as Calvin and Beth Jarrett?

    Oh hell no. The movie was perfectly cast as is.

    ReplyCopy URL
    RobertPius
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #198244

    I’d always heard Lee Remink, Natalie Wood and Tom Skerritt were the other front runners.

    Hard to picture Dickinson in the role. She always had a sexy image. Beth was supposed to be an “ordinary” surburban housewife.

    I think the film is perfectly cast (even the small roles like Hutton’s friends and especially Elizabeth McGovern.) She was a unique goofy prescence in the film.  I always like the girl who is trying to sell her brother’s clarinet too. Every person who spoke was pitch perfect so I credit that to the director. 

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Reply To: Was Ordinary People correctly cast?

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
AviChri... - Oct 18, 2017
Movies
Hunter-ish - Oct 18, 2017
Movies