Why was Ridley Scott snubbed at Oscars for ‘The Martian’? YOUR THEORIES

Home // Forums // Movies // Why was Ridley Scott snubbed at Oscars for ‘The Martian’? YOUR THEORIES

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 51 total)
Created
2 years ago
Last Reply
2 years ago
50
replies
2676
views
34
users
3
3
2
  • Marcus Dixon
    Keymaster
    Joined:
    Jun 12th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209418

    We need your theories (legitimate and conpiracy) for why Ridley Scott was snubbed for “The Martian.” He was the frontrunner to WIN this race at the Oscars. Let’s hear it!

    Reply
    ProfessorChaos
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 10th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209420

    He was the front runner from people who don’t vote. In reality, he didn’t have enough #1 or #2 rankings. That’s it

    ReplyCopy URL
    DamianWayne
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 21st, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209421

    He was never the frontrunner.

    ReplyCopy URL
    MrGoodWood
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 14th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209422

    Ridley Scott makes a blockbuster like The Martian once a year. His work in The Martian isn’t any better (or worse) than his work in, say, Prometheus. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    JOHN
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 24th, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209423

    The Director’s branch is the most complicated branch in the Academy. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    babypook
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209424

    Agree with Mr Chaos. Not enough #1/2 votes.

    And it is a divisive film.

    He’s an old hat with this but it’s got to hurt.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Atypical
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 1st, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209425

    No room for two veterans? The sci-fi bias holds less water nowadays. I see Scott’s snubbing as more of a Director’s Branch quirk than anything necessarily against him. Haynes was snubbed too, and Spielberg. Abrams too for the biggest BO hit of all time. It’s that DGA nod that got people’s hopes up, along with such a clearly positive critical and commercial reception for “The Martian.”

    ReplyCopy URL
    Rooney Moore
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 2nd, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209426

    3 adventure/sci-fi movies was never getting in at the same time in Director lineup. Never, with this branch. It was up to you to choose which one of those three(Revenant, MM, The Martian) or more get snubbed and replaced by an indie. I’d personally assumed Mad Max would be the one that get kicked off first solely because it’s a sequel, and a gritty one at that. But no one can’t deny it’s more of a directioral achivement than The Martian could ever hoped to be, so I respect their choices and thank them for not being squemish.

    This branch, out of all, rarely care about name recognition as it can be seen from this year.

    DGA=16.000 members.

    Academy’s Directing Branch=400 voters.
    People like Neil Patrick Harris, Robin Wright and David Boreanaz are member of DGA, because they’ve directed one or two episodes of their own show.
    We can’t expect that group to prefer bolder, more niche and artsy things than the Academy.

    ReplyCopy URL
    GusCruz
    Participant
    Joined:
    Feb 26th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209427

    How was he the frontrunner? What had he won for The Martian? This came from dellusional people who can’t see what’s right in front of their eyes.

    ReplyCopy URL
    kvothe_snow
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 11th, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209428

    He was never the frontrunner going in to this race. People who made him frontrunner based it on the fact that he’s due for one. Pretty sure that’s not how the academy works.

    ReplyCopy URL
    PJ Edwards
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 2nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209429

    Film was too slight. It fit the captain Phillips, Argo mold to a tee. He needed McCarthy snubbed at DGA to have had a chance.

    EDIT: oh yeah, I CALLED IT

    ReplyCopy URL
    manakamana
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 28th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209431

    I was thinking The Martian would only get 2 between Director/Actor/Screenplay. I thought Actor was a lot more vulnerable. 

    I guess it comes down to how tasteful the directors’ branch is, although they ignored Todd Haynes so maybe not. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Patrick
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 18th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209430

    They wanted some new blood in the directing race is my guess. Abrahamson, Miller, McCarthy, and McKay are all first time nominees for best director. Inñaritu is a past nominee, but his achievement for The Revenant was too big to ignore.

    ReplyCopy URL
    KubrickFan98
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 28th, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209432

    George Bush did it.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Bradley Weir
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 16th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #209433

    Many on here called him the fronrunner because of the narrative behind it, rather than the directorial achievement itself (which was still good). It’s clear that The Revenant, Mad Max: Fury Road, The Big Short and Spotlight are the Top 4 this season so it makes sense that all four of their directors made it. Room obviously had a lot of passion votes. Fantastic lineup.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 51 total)
Reply To: Why was Ridley Scott snubbed at Oscars for ‘The Martian’? YOUR THEORIES

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
Ron Loyola - Aug 19, 2017
Movies
Chris B... - Aug 18, 2017
Movies