One of Sean Penn’s Oscars should have gone to … instead

Home // Forums // Polls! // One of Sean Penn’s Oscars should have gone to … instead

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Created
4 years ago
Last Reply
4 years ago
10
replies
333
views
9
users
2
1
1
  • Daniel B.
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542165

    Sean Penn is currently tied for the record for the most wins in the Lead Actor category at the Oscars, with two (for Mystic River in 2003 and Milk in 2008).

    Do you think he deserved both of the Oscars he won, or do you think another one of the nominees he was up against deserved it more?

    Reply
    Daniel B.
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542167

    I think Sean Penn is a great actor, but I personally think he didn’t deserve the win either years he took home the trophy.  I would have given Johnny Depp the Oscar in 2003, and Mickey Rourke in 2008. But if I had to choose just one, I would go with Mickey Rourke.

    With that in mind, I do believe Penn should have an Oscar on his mantle, but for Dead Man Walking (1995), not Mystic River or Milk.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Malick
    Member
    Joined:
    Dec 24th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542168

    How Mickey Rourke lost is just beyond me. So he’s my choice. But a really good case could also be made for Ben Kingsley, Johnny Depp and Bill Murray.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Baby Clyde
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 8th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542169

    Sean Penn gets to keep his Oscars.

    Easily the best both years.

    ReplyCopy URL
    unsunganthem
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 9th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542170

    I’m gonna have to say nobody here. I really like Bill Murray. Who doesn’t, right? But I can’t honestly say his performance in LIT was better than Penn’s in MR. It was close, but not close enough. I sure do hope Murray gets an Oscar someday! As for 2008, Penn was far-and-away the Best Actor for MILK!

    ReplyCopy URL
    Anthony
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 17th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542171

    At the time, I supported Sean Penn’s win for Mystic River and also felt that there was a chance he wouldn’t be back in contention again….but then as the next few years rolled on, I went back to revisit Mystic River and found it to be overwrought and it didn’t hold up for me. Frankly, I think Penn should’ve been nominated for 21 GRAMS that year.

    I voted for Bill Murray, who gave such a sweet subtle performance that was remarkably believable considering he is usually known for playing brash and more snide characters….plus, it helps that Lost in Translation holds up strongly and it is also a great opportunity to recognize him for a great performance along with it being almost like a veteran award. Ben Kingsley was also quite good that year, as was Johnny Depp.

    As for 2008, Mickey Rourke was nipping at his heels but he deserved it for MILK, which is still my favorite performance of his. The compassion in his performance was lovely and I also adored the film. 

    Going back to 1995, Sean Penn would be an extremely close second to Nicholas Cage for my vote (I haven’t seen either film in some time though) and then 2001, he was not in the same league as Tom Wilkinson.

    ReplyCopy URL
    allabout oscars
    Member
    Joined:
    Sep 20th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542172

    I think ben Kingsley’s performance in THE HOUSE OF
    SAND AND FOG  was easily the best of that year….Penn
    was very good but not my choice.

    He most deservedly won his MILK  oscar…

    ReplyCopy URL
    Miss Frost
    Member
    Joined:
    Sep 14th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542173

    Horrible winner in 2003, definitely should’ve gone to BILL MURRAY.
    Fine winner though in 2008, though my choice would’ve been MICKEY ROURKE.

    ReplyCopy URL
    unsunganthem
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 9th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542174

    On the subject of Bill Murray love, I actually think he should have won for his Supporting Role in 1998 for Rushmore, but the stupid damn Academy didn’t bother to nominate him.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Madson Melo
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 25th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542175

    In 2003 case I think Kingsley was underrated and Murray was overrated (even if I think he was great in LIT)

    ReplyCopy URL
    Marcus Snowden (The Artist Formerly Known as msnowden1)
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 18th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #542176

    I think that Penn deserved the Oscar in 2003 for Mystic River. However, he did not deserve the Oscar in 2008. Mickey Rourke should have easily won that year, IMO.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Reply To: One of Sean Penn’s Oscars should have gone to … instead

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
darthva... - Aug 17, 2017
Polls!
darthva... - Aug 14, 2017
Polls!