Home Forums Polls! Should the Academy go back to 5 nominees for Best Picture?

Should the Academy go back to 5 nominees for Best Picture?

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Created
5 years ago
Last Reply
5 years ago
13
replies
428
views
12
users
KyleBailey
2
Baby Clyde
1
GoMe91
1
  • popofculturejune121986
    Member
    Joined:
    Jan 2nd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541709

    For 2013 should the Academy go back to five nominees for Best Picture, keep the rule that it could be between five and ten but the film must receive 10 percent as the number one choice or should they just do ten?

    Reply
    Baby Clyde
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 8th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541711

    Obviously.

    ReplyCopy URL
    GoMe91
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 25th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541712

    They should go back to ten. A lot of deserving movies would have been snubbed if it had just been 5. (I mean, imagine if Beasts and Amour had been there for ZDT and Argo…all 4 of these movies are great, but a lot people would be pissed nonetheless).

    If there had been 10 nominees this year, I’m pretty confident something cool like Skyfall or Moonrise Kingdom would have gotten in. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Junk
    Member
    Joined:
    Jul 2nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541713

    Yes, especially this year. Of the nine BP nominees this year, I haven’t seen ZD30 and Beasts. So of the seven, I only found Amour, Argo to be BP worthy, and Django and Life of Pi to be okish nominees. All the rest (Les Mis, SLP, Lincoln) have no business really being called the best pictures of the year.

    ReplyCopy URL
    allabout oscars
    Member
    Joined:
    Sep 20th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541714

    Should never been changed from five…..
    Plenty of great films in past years were left off……that’s the way it should be…having nominated more films has cheapened the oscars….remember the blind side, DJANGO unchained and tree of life….never should be in same breath as the actual best films of the year. Imo

    ReplyCopy URL
    Max 2.0
    Member
    Joined:
    Sep 28th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541715

    No.

    ReplyCopy URL
    JayDF
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 18th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541716

    The expansion to more than 5 cheapens it for me.  I personally don’t care if people get pissed off that this film or that film didn’t make the cut…actually I do care, that’s one fo the reasons why the whole thing is so interesting.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Laactingnyc
    Participant
    Joined:
    May 29th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541717

    Yes they should go back to 5. When you make it 10 it sort of cheapens it. With 5 it’s more ELITE

    ReplyCopy URL
    Daniel B.
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541718

    While I understand why the top category shouldn’t be easier to get into than the Best Director category, I personally am glad that there are allowed to be up to 10 nominees. This welcomes more films that otherwise wouldn’t have been nominated (Up, District 9, Toy Story 3, Django Unchained), and some that would have been on the verge of either just making it in, or just missing out (127 Hours, Inception, Moneyball, The Help, Argo, Zero Dark Thirty). Of course there have been a few head-scratching inclusions (The Blind Side), even with the 5% cutoff rule (Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close), but there have always been and always will be head-scratching nominations in any category, no matter how many nominees there are.

    ReplyCopy URL
    dannyboy.
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 11th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541719

    This five percent rule seems like a way for them to cherry pick. Either a solid five or a solid ten. I’m not accusing them, just saying that’s the way it feels.

    ReplyCopy URL
    babypook
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541720

    Keep it at up to ten. More leeway, and so much better.

    ReplyCopy URL
    24Emmy
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 4th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541721

    People will complain either way. I’m fine with whatever.

    I’d like to see a film I actually like win for a change though. 😉

    ReplyCopy URL
    KyleBailey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541722

    Ten. Since they changed it, 2011 could have had Bridesmaids, Harry Potter 7.2, or Drive; 2012 could have had Moonrise Kingdom, Dark Kinght Rises, or Skyfall; and 2013 could have had Saving Mr. Banks or Inside Llewyn Davis. I think that it’s better that way because 5 is just “lets push the smallest indie possible to push out The Dark Knight”. It shows more of a variety and it gets people out to see more amazing movies they might have never gone to see. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    KyleBailey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #541723

    Ten. Since they changed it, 2011 could have had Bridesmaids, Harry Potter 7.2, or Drive; 2012 could have had Moonrise Kingdom, Dark Kinght Rises, or Skyfall; and 2013 could have had Saving Mr. Banks or Inside Llewyn Davis. I think that it’s better that way because 5 is just “lets push the smallest indie possible to push out The Dark Knight”. It shows more of a variety and it gets people out to see more amazing movies they might have never gone to see. 

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Reply To: Should the Academy go back to 5 nominees for Best Picture?

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
Andrew D - Aug 31, 2017
Polls!
darthva... - Aug 21, 2017
Polls!