Which of these nominees that lost Directing in the last 10 years is the best?

Home // Forums // Polls! // Which of these nominees that lost Directing in the last 10 years is the best?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
Created
5 years ago
Last Reply
5 years ago
17
replies
346
views
15
users
3
1
1
  • Renaton
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 4th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539707

    All of the people on the list were nominees for Directing that lost in the last 10 years. Which one among them do you think is the best?

    Reply
    Pieman1994
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 14th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539709

    This is tough. The Social Network is among my five favorite films of all time, but Fernando Meirelles directed City of God to perfection. In fact, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Paul Greengrass or Paul Thomas Anderson. Those for in particular I would at least consider putting over their respective victors. Everyone else is kinda meh. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Renaton
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 4th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539710

    I’m voting for Malick, but had Fincher been nominated for “Zodiac” it would’ve easily been my choice. “The Social Network” and “Inglorious Basterds” tie in second for me.

    ReplyCopy URL
    iveriver
    Member
    Joined:
    Aug 11th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539711

    Tarantino for Inglorious Basterds, with Malick close behind.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Trent
    Member
    Joined:
    May 14th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539712

    Anderson for There Will Be Blood, with Tarantino and Fincher close behind. Darren Aronofsky should be up here for Black Swan.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Malick
    Member
    Joined:
    Dec 24th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539713

    Terrence Malick for his incredibly brave/ballsy feature, followed by a tie for second between, Pedro Almodovar and  Fernando Meirelles.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Junk
    Member
    Joined:
    Jul 2nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539714

    Hands down. Fincher.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Emmys2011
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 29th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539715

    Tie between fincher and malick hands down
    Then tarantino + I agree with the one who said aronofsky should be there…

    ReplyCopy URL
    Maxwell Grey
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 7th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539716

    Darren Aronofsky should be up here for Black Swan.

    I would have totally voted for him.

    I’ll just go with Fincher. 

    Edit: Btw, Pedro Almodovár is my second option. Representing! 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Renaton
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 4th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539717

    I went with one for each year. Since Fincher was more competitive and the film was more acclaimed, I decided to go with him. Also, to be honest, I didn’t like “Black Swan” very much. Extremely flawed film, and many of those flaws come from directing. Had he been nominated for “The Wrestler” instead, I would’ve probably included him.

    ReplyCopy URL
    awardskel
    Member
    Joined:
    Nov 6th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539718

    Fincher’s an easy choice as his film is the film that will be studied the most. But, for me, the film that really stands out is 2006’s United 93. The fact that the man (Greengrass) has the guts to, 5 years after such a devistating tragedy as 9/11, direct a film based on that event is ballsy.

    A most cathartic experience came over me when I viewed the much publicized “United 93”. At once speculative and realistic, the 111-minute film will surely bring back the pall of fatalistic inevitability one feels about 9/11, but its more defining characteristic is revealing the untapped heroism and humanism of people caught in the most malevolent of circumstances. Masterfully written and directed by Paul Greengrass, this relentlessly intense movie covers that fateful morning when United Airlines Flight 93 departed Newark for San Francisco with 33 passengers and seven crew members on board.

    As it turns out, Greengrass’s heavy background in documentaries turns out to be a blessing in this treatment, as he tracks the subsequent events in real time and uses either under-the-radar actors or actual aviation personnel to play the real-life characters. Instead of focusing on the higher profile passengers to provide an emotional locus, which a more commercial filmmaker would have done, he encompasses all the passengers within the emotional purview of the film, including the four hijackers who killed the pilots and took control of the plane. The key dramatic difference is that we get to know not the people but the situation at hand. Consequently, we get a more realistic sense of the scale of the events that may have occurred on that flight. That’s not to say it is any less devastating. In fact, the last half-hour is harrowing in the most personal sense as the inevitable becomes reality. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Carbon Based Lifeform
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 20th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539719

    FACTOID: For such an “important” film, THE SOCIAL NETWORK merits a less-than-impressive #588 ranking in Sight & Sound’s 2012 Greatest Films Poll.

    Only two critics and one director voted for that film.

    On the other hand, THE TREE OF LIFE ranks #102. I never understood why so many people hated that movie–it’s great. Even Brad Pitt is great in that film.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Renaton
    Member
    Joined:
    Jun 4th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539720

    It’s been only 2 years. Of course it wouldn’t be in Sight & Sound very high. “Tree Of Life” did quite well on the critics side, but it’s not clear if it’s only leftover love from the acclaim it had last year, or if it’s really gonna become such a huge mark for filmmaking.

    Also, it would be hard for “The Social Network” to do well on Sight & Sound’s directors list. Directors tend to vote for films and directors that directly influenced them, and many of these people tend to go towards choices that affected them in their formative years.

    As for critics, time will tell, but it stands a good chance, although I think “Zodiac” will become his most acclaimed film (and it’s already higher than “The Social network” on the list too). 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Madson Melo
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 25th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539721

    I voted without think. I evaluated the entire career, not only the movie that received a nomination lol PTA #1 and Fincher #2, but Leigh is a master and VD is marvelous, so I’m ok.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Anthony
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 17th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #539722

    David Fincher wins this hands down! This list is deinitely stronger than that of the actual winners, for sure. I do think Darren Aronofsky and Rob Marshall should have been on this list as well.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
Reply To: Which of these nominees that lost Directing in the last 10 years is the best?

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
Andrew D - Aug 31, 2017
Polls!
darthva... - Aug 21, 2017
Polls!