Home Forums Television jane kazmarek and the Emmys

jane kazmarek and the Emmys

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Created
3 months ago
Last Reply
3 months ago
12
replies
696
views
10
users
3
1
1
  • Chris
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 11th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163082

    How the heck did this lady not win an Emmy!? I’m new to “Malcolm”, but her performance on the show was outstanding! What went wrong? Submissions?

    • This topic was modified 2 months, 4 weeks ago by  Chris.
    • This topic was modified 2 months, 4 weeks ago by  Chris.
    Reply
    Andrew Carden
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 16th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163239

    Kaczmarek’s submissions were a mixed bag for sure. That said, she did ace her tape in 2003 (with “Baby”) and, even with rather ho-hum submissions from her foes, still couldn’t prevail.

    For the finest in film reviews and awards analysis, please visit me at The Awards Connection!

    ReplyCopy URL
    Anonymous
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163284

    It’s a crime she never won. She was amazing.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Jake
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 2nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163808

    I’d submit her in supporting if it was up to me. There was no reason for her being in Lead and Cranston in Supporting given the structure of the show – they should be both on the same level so either Cranston in Lead along with Muniz or both ‘parents’ in supporting.

    ReplyCopy URL
    pulp50
    Participant
    Joined:
    Feb 13th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163847

    It sucks she never won. She could have definitely gone supporting, Cranston usually had more to do each season. I’m not sure why she went lead and him supporting, or why he only got like 2 or 3 nominations, they were both fantastic on the show and should have each won at least once.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Icky
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 28th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163851

    She had the best tape a couple years. But I believe she was always hurt by the feeling that she probably belonged in supporting and that the show had a child lead. Plus, a single camera series that cartoonish in nature was very unusual at the time.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Reid
    Participant
    Joined:
    Feb 11th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163893

    It’s all Patricia Heaton’s fault.

    ReplyCopy URL
    pulp50
    Participant
    Joined:
    Feb 13th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163899

    It’s all Patricia Heaton’s fault.

    And those sex and the city bitches.

    ReplyCopy URL
    montana82
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 14th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202163996

    Jane didn’t win for several reasons:

    1. It was a borderline role. The show mostly focused on Muniz and his bros. And at times Cranston who went supporting had more of a role.

    2. She played a generally over the top unlikable character. Almost fatal if you are a woman. Most of the biggest female losers on the comedy side also were unlikable women (Kim Cattrall, Julia Duffy, Faith Ford).

    3. Besides 2001, 2003, and 2006 she really submitted terribly. But the fact she lost those 3 yrs suggests no matter what episode she submitted she still likely leaves empty handed.

    4. The Emmys at the time were still very hesitant to reward non studio audience multi cam comedy shows. They wanted broad comedy with studio audiences laughing hysterically.

    ReplyCopy URL
    jf123
    Participant
    Joined:
    Feb 15th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202164019

    You motherfucker. I thought she died for a split second after I saw this thread.

    She should have won at least once, I think the fact that the show was so different and niche compared to what was being aired at the time (Friends, Raymond). I think if the show premiered five years later she would have won.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Honey
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 30th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202164022

    She should’ve been Laura linney-ing all the Emmy awards for that show

    ReplyCopy URL
    pulp50
    Participant
    Joined:
    Feb 13th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202164029

    It’s too bad she hasn’t had another big show since then. I hope it still happens some day.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Madson Melo
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 25th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202164062

    She deserved some wins, but she was borderline supporting and, imo, never had the best tape out of the bunch in the years nominated.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Reply To: jane kazmarek and the Emmys

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Similar Topics
Tom O'Neil - Oct 20, 2017
Television
Boidiva02 - Oct 18, 2017
Television