Home Forums Television Supporting Actress Drama: Who deserved more than 1 nom?

Supporting Actress Drama: Who deserved more than 1 nom?

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Created
2 years ago
Last Reply
2 years ago
12
replies
718
views
12
users
1
1
1
  • Gone_Guy
    Member
    Joined:
    Jan 22nd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358094

    Results of Drama Supporting Actor:
    1. Walton Goggins, “Justified” – 39%
    2. T.R. Knight, “Grey’s Anatomy” – 26%
    3. Jared Harris, “Mad Men” – 17%
    4. Freddy Rodriguez, “Six Feet Under” – 9%

    —–

    – Morena Baccarin, “Homeland” (2013) – Lost to Anna Gunn, “Breaking Bad.”


    – Kelly MacDonald, “Boardwalk Empire” (2011) – Lost to Margo Martindale, “Justified.”

    – Sharon Gless, “Burn Notice” (2010) – Lost to Archie Panjabi, “The Good Wife”

    – C.C.H. Pounder, “The Shield” (2005) – Lost to Blythe Danner, “Huff.”

    – Robin Weigert, “Deadwood” (2004) – Lost to Drea de Matteo, “The Sopranos”


    – Mary-Louise Parker, “The West Wing” (2002) – Lost to Stockard Channing, “The West Wing.”

    – Maura Tierney, “E.R” (2001) – Lost to Allison Janney, “The West Wing.”

    —–

    Exceptions and ineligibilities for this poll:


    *WON — 2011: Margo Martindale, “Justified” (season 2) – Won for the only season
    she was on.


    – 2009: Hope Davis, “In Treatment” (season 2) – Only season she was on.


    – 2007: Lorraine Bracco, “The Sopranos (season 6/part 2) – Received a
    nomination for Supporting, but had received three prior nominations for Lead in
    1999, 2000, and 2001.


    – 2006: Jean Smart, “24” (season 5) – She garnered a nomination for Guest the
    very next year.


    – 2003: Rachel Griffiths, “Six Feet Under” (season 3) – Received a nomination
    for Supporting, but had received a prior nomination for Lead in 2002.


    – 2003: Lena Olin, “Alias” (season 2) – The only season she was eligible for
    Supporting.

    Reply
    zordon
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 16th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358096

    Katherine Heigl deserved at least one, or maybe even 2 more noms. She had this great Danny storyline in season 2 and when Izzie had cancer in season 5 – both seasons had some terrific potential submissions for Heigl. But on the other hand it’s her, and not Oh or Wilson, who is Emmy winner.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Riley
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 11th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358097

    Cherry Jones should be ineligible.  She was only in two seasons, winning for the first and not submitting for the second, which she would have been a lock to win.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Rooney Moore
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 2nd, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358098

    As much as I love Heigl, maybe more than anyone here, she didn’t deserve consecutive nominations (maybe more than two)for this role.
    It was a decent performance. But I don’t think she created interesting, unique and memorable character like Sandra Oh did with Cristina or Chandra Wilson did with Bailey.
    It was a performance more like on the same level with Ellen Pompeo‘s. Great and enjoyable but nothing special. Any above average actor could have played her part. She deserved her Emmy but it’s wrong on many levels considering she is the only one in her cast member to win an Emmy.

    Yet,apart from this, she also didn’t deserve the backlash she got after explaining her choice for not submitting her name for Emmy in season 4. When I first heard about this, I thought it was a sweet of her to rejecting to be nominated for a year she wasn’t given material and I kinda wished all actor could humble like her. It was already unanturally a short season because of writer’s strike. And most of the chararcters stories were looked meaningless and up in the air after the season has ended.
    But now, just Google her name, and you can see on every website How she refused to take her Emmy, and how she blamed her showrunners for that.
    Gross.

     

    ReplyCopy URL
    Tonbone
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 15th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358099

    Kelly Macdonald continued giving knock-out performances even after the Academy snubbed her. It was unfair she was a one-time thing. 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Atypical
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 1st, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358100

    Voted for CCH Pounder. She was the beating conscience of “The Shield” in the show’s entire run. One single nomiantion isn’t nearly enough for the staggering performance she gave here. The Emmys should have latched onto Drea long before season 5. I don’t think I would have nominated Mary-Louise Parker again for “The West Wing,” but she was very much competitive for season 3 (I’d have placed her over Stockard Channing and possibly second to Lauren Ambrose, depending on the day). On the other hand, Katherine Heigl earned more than one nomination in her run on “Grey’s Anatomy.” The LVAD storyline with Denny in season 2 was epic, and I see her controversial Emmy win as a sort of acknowledgment of that earlier slight. Even Izzie’s cancer arc had worth to it in places (beyond the ghost sex parts, ugh!). Maura Tierney did wonders in the last years of “ER.” It would have been nice to see her anchoring work recognized somewhere. I think the primary reason for her nomination was that being the season of Hurricane Sally Field blazing in as Abby’s bipolar mother. But to be fair, Field helped bring out the best in Tierney and made that her best season.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Anonymous
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358101

    Morena Baccarin because I love her so much 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Emmys2011
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 29th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358102

    I DO NOT agree with a reality were Katherine Heigl won and emmy and Sandra Oh and/or Chandra Wilson didn´t. However, I do think she was pretty strong in the first seasons, and deserved at least one more nom.

    ReplyCopy URL
    WaltEagle
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 10th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358103

    Robin Weigert deserved to win for all three seasons. Greatest Supporting Actress performance ever. But CCH Pounder would also be in my top 5 for that list.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Dixon Steele
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 14th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358104

    Kelly MacDonald

    ReplyCopy URL
    JB
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 13th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358105

    Ranking these choices…

    1. Maura Tierney
    2. Katherine Heigl
    3. CCH Pounder
    4. Cherry Jones
    5. Kelly MacDonald
    6. Drea DeMatteo
    7. Morena Baccarin
    8. Robin Weigart
    9. Sharon Gless
    10. Mary Louise Parker 

    ReplyCopy URL
    Boidiva02
    Participant
    Joined:
    May 24th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358106

    I had to go with Maura Tierney. She delivered exceptional performances in every season she was on, it was just too bad that much of her best work came when “E.R.” had already fallen off the Emmy radar.  

    ReplyCopy URL
    Icky
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 28th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #358107

    I would have liked de Metteo to get a nod for season four, which was almost as strong for her as season five. However, this is between Pounder and Tierney. I’d go with the former, because Tierney was lead after her first couple of seasons on ER. 

    Always thought MacDonald did the best she could with her material, but I never thought that material was awards worthy. 

    Heigel got her one deserved nod and win. It was just for the wrong season.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
jf123 - Nov 17, 2017
Television
Andrew D - Nov 16, 2017
Television