Facebook Down?, What Questions Do You Have for Aaron Paul & Timothy Olyphant?, Veep or Louie for the 6th slot? , Outstanding Supporting Actor Emmy Winner (1980-2013), Outstanding Supporting Actress Emmy Winner (1980-2013), Official MAN OF STEEL Thread, The 2013 Emmy Awards Discussion: Comedy Categories Part Tres!, The 2013 Emmy Awards Discussion: Drama Categories Part Cinco!, Goldderby Q&A Thread (Pt. 14), Best Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series, 1996
Welcome - Make Your Predictions! Give Us Feedback!, Oscars, Golden Globes and Film Awards, Primetime Emmys, Daytime Emmys, Tony Awards, Grammys and Music Awards, General Discussion: All Non-Award Topics, Games! Games! Let's Play Games!, Report SPAM Here, Polls! Polls! Who Should Give Back Their Oscar? , Daytime Emmys Judging 2012, Daytime Emmys Judging - 2011
Advertisement
| May 27th 2012, 10:51 |
|
|
|
Palme d’Or: Amour |
| May 27th 2012, 11:04 |
|
|
|
So both Holy Motors and Rust and Bone - two French films expected to get some recognition - get rien Cannes juries are always hard to predict
|
| May 27th 2012, 11:05 |
|
|
|
Nothing for "Holy Motors" and "Rust and Bones." Post Tenebras Lux won Director! Haha. Way to go Reygadas!
![]() |
| May 27th 2012, 11:05 |
|
|
|
I could have done worse with my predictions. Moretti cited the two principle actors in giving Amour the Palme, but I thought instead of giving Haneke his second they'd give one or both of those actors a prize instead but he did it and you can't take that away from him. He's got a Palme for German and a Palme for his French cinema, all in the course of four years. Crazy. Also, turns out Moretti hated Holy Motors so I guess they just let Post Tenebras Lux take up the weirdness quota. And I knew they'd want to give Garrone something. |
| May 27th 2012, 11:25 |
|
|
|
A synopsis for some of the main winners: Amour (Michael Hanecke): Georges and Anne are in their eighties. They are cultivated, retired music teachers. Their daughter, who is also a musician, lives abroad with her family. One day, Anne has an attack. The couple's bond of love is severely tested. Beyond the Hills (Cristian Mungiu - directed and wrote 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days): A drama centered on the friendship between two young women who grew up in the same orphanage; one has found refuge at a convent in Romania and refuses to leave with her friend, who now lives in Germany. The Hunt (Thomas Vinterberg): The story is set in a small Danish village around Christmas, and follows a man who becomes the target of mass hysteria. Post Tenebra Lux (Carlos Reygadas): Juan and his urban family live in the Mexican countryside, where they enjoy and suffer a world apart. And nobody knows if these two worlds are complementary or if they strive to eliminate one another. Reality (Matteo Garrone): The narrative is set in the world of reality television, and follows a Neapolitan fishmonger who participates in Grande Fratello, the Italian version of Big Brother. The Angels' Share (Ken Loach): It tells the story of a young father who narrowly avoids a jail sentence. He is determined to turn over a new leaf and when he and his friends visit a whisky distillery, a route to a new life becomes apparent. |
| May 27th 2012, 12:12 |
|
|
|
"Reality" sounds very silly when you actually read the reviews. It's just another meta reality show film. I can't say this line-up is bad, obviously, because I haven't seen the films, but it's a bit too predictable and safe and, well, boring. Everyone of these guys won before, everyone of them are extremely acclaimed directors that have a built-in audience no matter what they do. Frankly, with the exception of "Amour" (that seems to have won because of its actors, since Moretti is not really a fan of Haneke), it seems Moretti just randomly picked between his favorite filmmakers in the competition. Either that, or he confirms once again that he has a very strict and conservative view of autueristic filmmaking. Even if all of these turn to be good films, most of them probably won because they didn't take many risks (besides Reygadas, but I don't like him, so fuck him). |
| May 27th 2012, 12:25 |
|
|
|
Also, considering the Palme D'Or win is very much a statement, it says a lot about Moretti and his jury that they avoided directors and films that aren't as known or accessible as some of the winners. Reygadas had a challenging film, but would Moretti been a fan of that one had he not been familar with the context to which it works in his career? Mungiu, Loach and Vinterberg aren't middlebrow, but they are all acclaimed filmmakers, all of them had relative success and popularity in the art house community and very rarely alienate their established audience. It was rather sad to see them shut out Leos Carax the way they did, when almost any other jury and/or president would've chosen that one. And it's very unfortunate that interesting directors like Hong Sang-soo and Cronenberg never get anything at these festivals. In the end, it will be a year where the winners do not at all correspond to what will truly leave a mark (even if the winners are actually good). |
| May 27th 2012, 13:06 |
|
|
|
^ About Holy Motors not winning anything, Nanni Moretti said this: "There were a large number of films that didn't get an award. The film by Leos Carax...the film of Carax, Seidl, and Reygadas were the ones where the opinion was the most divided in the jury. I don't think that it's fair to try and seek unanimity amongst all the jury members because otherwise you end up making concessions and no one's truly satisfied. We, therefore, held lengthy discussions, and one of these controversial films got an award and the other two did not." About 26 minutes in: http://www.festival-cannes.fr/en/mediaPlayer/12536.html |
| May 27th 2012, 20:49 |
|
|
|
Ah, so Michael Haneke wins the Palme d'Or for "Amour". I see. Will make a feeble effort to see the film. I'd rather see a psycho-off between Haneke and von Trier. The Sunne in Splendour; I prefer my Roses White |
| May 28th 2012, 00:09 |
|
|
|
Wow. Amour. It seems kind of strange that a Haneke was the conventional pick for the Palme. I am beyond shocked Holy Motors went home empty handed. I thought for sure Carax had at least Director or Grand Prix, if not the big one. It would probably had one the Palme with most other jury presidents. I mean how can you ignore the reception it had? I got one right by picking Reygadas for Director. I just knew this was his best bet. Also I'm surprised Reality scored Grand Prix. So Garrone has two Grand Prix and Haneke has two Palmes. Finally, I knew in my gut Moretti would pick Loach for something. They seem like they have the same sensibilities. |
| May 28th 2012, 17:14 |
|
|
|
I was also surprised that REALITY won Grand Prix. However, I scrounged up these two reviews, which both agree the film is better than its subject matter might lend you to believe: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A review by John Bleasdale in CINE-VUE Cannes Film Festival 2012: 'Reality' review ★★★★★
Matteo Garrone's 2008 Grand Jury Prize winner Gomorrah
was a huge success both internationally and in its native Italy, where
its director has since become something of a national hero - albeit one
who remains under permanent police guard. For his follow-up, Reality (2012),
Garrone has bravely eschewed material aping his blood-drenched crime
drama. Yet at the same time, the story is lifted from a similar milieu
of marginalised Neapolitan lives, explored with sympathy and humour.Aniello Arena (in his feature debut) plays Luciano, a Neapolitan fishmonger whose illegal scams help to bolster the family income. A happy-go-lucky guy who we first see dressing up in drag to amuse family members at a wedding, his life is turned upside down when he applies for TV's Big Brother (Grande Fratello as it is known in Italy) and is invited to Rome for an audition. Utterly convinced that he is going to enter the show, Luciano becomes obsessed with the possibility that the TV execs are checking up on him and starts behaving in an increasingly unhinged manner.
Luciano's large extended family try everything to bring him back to his
senses but he seems to be obsessed, convinced that sooner or later the
phone call will come that will make him rich and famous. His
long-suffering wife Maria (Loredana Simioli) is at the end of her tether
and the rest of the family - who seem to all live
one-on-top-of-the-other in a little courtyard - almost serve as a Greek
chorus as they offer conflicting advice, sympathy and admonitions.A synopsis like this does little justice to the sheer scope and scale of Garrone's Reality. His very first shot is a sweeping panorama of 18th century Naples, with the role of fantasy and the contingent status of reality are immediately introduced. Garrone subtly implies that reality television has become, in Silvio Berlusconi's wake, a substitute for the Church's power and a vital tool for promoting a secular Heaven on Earth: entering the BB House with the nubile, the young and the soon to be rich. There are moments here of broad comedy - Enzo (Raffaele Ferrante), a former winner who Luciano pleads for assistance, is hilarious - but Garrone's film is ill-described as a comedy. Rather, it is a biting portrait of the toxic effects of an aspirational culture which pretends to be open when it is in fact barred and gated. Although we can now look to Garrone as an established voice in contemporary Italian cinema, Reality is also firmly-rooted in the traditions of great Italian film. There are Fellini-esque touches of surrealism, but also nods to the neo-realist directors. The character of Luciano echoes similar roles in two classic efforts: the father (Lamberto Maggiarani) from The Bicycle Thieves (1948) and partly Anna Magnani from Bellissima (1951). Perhaps it is the latter film which Reality most resembles thematically, but Garrone has also made a truly wonderful film entirely of his own. John Bleasdale ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A review by Dan Mecca in THE FILM STAGE
Reality
Cannes 2012 Review
[Fandango; 2012] Director: Matteo Garrone Runtime: 115 minutes Matteo Garrone‘s Reality never becomes the vicious criticism of unearned fame and non-stop television one might expect from the man who revived the mafia picture with Gomorrah only four years ago. That film had a raw energy that jumped off the screen. Garrone’s follow-up is decidedly more concentrated and deftly-paced, the filmmaker determined to explore the world of his anti-hero Luciano (the engrossing Aniello Arena), a family man living simply and happily in Naples who allows himself to fall apart in pursuit of his dream to be famous.
What begins as a funny party trick at a family wedding escalates into obsession. We watch Luciano put on a dress and some make-up to have some fun with Enzo, a star from reality television paid to make an appearance at the reception. This well-received prank, along with the constant compliments his extended family throws his way, convince the man he should try out for the next season of Italy’s “Big Brother.” What follows is a dissent into obsession that begins funny before it becomes both something tragic and tragically familiar. Garrone is careful with the tone here, beautifully toeing the line between comedy and drama. We laugh at Luciano but never feel he’s being bullied by the film he is in.
Both the film’s opening and closing shot traverse from the sky to the earth and vice versa, accenting Luciano’s building, “head in the clouds” perception of life. It’s when we, and Luciano, are brought to the church for salvation that the depths of Garrone’s observations begin to take shape, transforming his film from woeful to heartbreaking. Religion cannot help this poor man any more than Enzo the star, who’s trademark catch phrase is simply “never give up” and “keep believing.” To simply tell those you love to keep trying at an impossible, foolish dream is as irresponsible as the dream itself. This foolishness comes to a head in a scene that features perhaps the best performance by a cricket since Pinocchio. Perhaps the film should have come to close soon after this moment, as the third act drags on a bit longer than necessary, the razor-tight pacing Garrone achieves throughout the first half getting a bit lost. Though the surrealism of the ending fights against the grounded narrative that comes before it, it feels like the right note to end on. Faith emerges as the culprit here, a weapon as dangerous as any gun when stricken with blindness. |
| May 31st 2012, 21:13 |
|
|
|
I didnt think I'd ever feel this way, but Cannes, their structure, and their process and eventual 'winners' is beginning to annoy me. They've made some incredibly great choices in the past; the 90's, a few in the 80's and 70's, 60's, etc. And last year with Tree of Life (yay!). I think many many of their choices have been terrific. Still, I think it's about time they give one to Sacha Baron Cohen. Should that happen, I'll stop thinking of Carson Clay from "Mr Bean's Holiday". The Sunne in Splendour; I prefer my Roses White |