We asked our forum posters: "What was the 'best' year from 2000 to 2012 for Razzie voters but the worst for moviegoers?"
Below are just some of their thoughts on the subject. Join in with your opinion as to the year that will live in infamy.
It's a toughie, but my vote goes to 2007. Why? Because: Eddie Murphy x 2 + Adam Sandler + Lindsay Lohan + Nicolas Cage looking very, very tired = a type of torture that is strictly prohibited by the Geneva Convention
2010 was both an amazing and terrible year for films.
Amazing: "The Social Network"; "Black Swan"; "The Fighter"; "Inception"; "The Kids Are All Right"; "Toy Story 3"; "The Town".
Terrible: The worst of all the "Twilight: movies; that attrocious live-action rendition of the incredible "Avatar: The Last Airbender"; "Sex and the City 2"; 'm pretty sure "Valentine's Day" was 2010, and that Hilary Swank movie.
The only years that have films listed above where, there isn't a single one I could stomach, are 2003 and 2006. I'll go with 2006. I'd rather have sand in my undies than a full-fledged wedgie.
2000 is pretty tough to beat for me. Four or five of the movies up there I was almost surprised are up there. Just because something isn't Oscar worthy, doesn't mean it isn't entertaining.
OTHER AWARDS NEWS: