Lindsay Lohan's buzzed-about performance of Elizabeth Taylor in Lifetime's telefilm "Liz & Dick" is tailor-made for the Razzie Awards. In fact, this two-time Razzie winner (Lohan tied herself as Lead Actress in "I Know Who Killed Me," 2007) encompasses nearly everything the Razzies look for in a performance.
The only problem? "Liz & Dick" is ineligible because it was made for television.
John Wilson, founder of the Golden Raspberry Awards, told Gold Derby, "If this had been a 'real' movie, as opposed to being made for cable, Lohan would be a shoo-in for a Worst Actress Razzie nomination." Strong words from the Razzies head honcho, but he didn't stop there.
After watching "Liz & Dick," Wilson told us, "Wow, whatta train wreck! At least the actor playing Burton [Grant Bowler] made an effort -- Lohan didn't bother doing much beyond just showing up to the make-up trailer and putting on wigs."
He finished his review by declaring Lohan's performance "utterly vacuous" and "embarrassing" -- two great qualities the Razzies look for every year when choosing their winners.
Wilson was hardly alone in his critique of Lohan. Ken Tucker (EW.com) wrote, "Taylor and Burton deserved better, and Lohan should have shed her protective shell and stepped up her game." Maureen Ryan (Huffington Post) found a somewhat-positive spin: "Lohan might actually be able to manage a comeback someday, but she's woefully miscast in this." And Matt Roush (TVGuide.com) snarked, "Even deep breaths seem too much to ask of Lindsay Lohan these days, let alone capturing the essence of an exotic film goddess who reigned for years as a superstar sex symbol."
It seems highly unlikely the Emmys will embrace Lohan or the telefilm at next year's ceremony. But what about the Golden Globes?
Don't forget, Globe voters love controvery and there always seems to be one or two head-scratchers on their ballot. Might Lohan or Bowler find themselves nominated next month by the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn.?
Win $100 predicting:
Emmys, MTV Movie Awards,
ACMs & Daytime Emmys
Read more about entry and rules here. Make your initial predictions now. Change them later as often as you wish up until the nominations or winners are announced.
Below, meet our past winners of recent award prediction contests.
Oscar Nominations: New York state resident Tim Kressner (gufa54) won $1,000 for reaping the highest percentage (78%) when predicting Academy Award noms. Watch our video chat with him here and learn his strategy for making picks. See the leaderboard here. See Kressner's predix here.
Golden Globes (Film): Mario Gomez, a med studen in Mexico, won our contest with the highest percentage of correct picks (86%) and highest point score (2,693). See our video chat with him here. Two other contestants also scored 86%: lulo1989 and eastwest. Tom O'Neil reaped best Experts' score. David Schnelwar had top score among our Editors. See the leaderboard here to see if you made the top tier.
Critics Choice Nominations: Bryce H scored an impressive 83% when sizing up 20 categories. That was one percentage point ahead of our smartest Editor, Daniel Montgomery. Our top Expert was also one of our Editors, Paul Sheehan, who reaped 74%. To see how you performed, check out our leaderboard plus the score section of your account page.
Golden Globe (Film) Nominations: Jonathan was our top User, reaping a staggering 86% when forecasting the lineup of 10 categories. That put him six percentage points ahead of our best Expert -- Scott Mantz (Access Hollywood) -- and eight ahead of our leading Editor, Daniel Montogomery. Did you made the cut on the leaderboard score breakdown?
Los Angeles Film Critics Association Award Winners: Christian aced all rivals, scoring 82%. That was almost 20 percentage points ahead of our top Expert (Edward Douglas of ComingSoon ) and Editor (Matt Noble), both of whom earned scores of 64%. Christian foresaw that surprise screenplay win for "Before Midnight." See leaderboard.