The process by which films get nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars is not as simple as you might imagine. Academy members don't merely cite their favorite films on a blank ballot that they ship to the accountants at PricewaterhouseCoopers. No, they rank up to five movies on ballots which are then counted by a complicated method that it's difficult to explain. But let's try.
While nominees in most of the other races will be determined by the traditional system of preferential ballot that winnows the pool down to a final five (as explained here) the, the Best Picture finalists will be arrived at by a separate system of tabulation.
There will be between five and 10 nominees for Best Picture. To reap a bid, a film has to be one of the top choices of at least 5% of the members taking part in the nomination phase. To illustrate how this system works, let's look at last year's race when there ended up being nine nominees.
Oscar nomination ballots for Best Picture were sent to the 5,783 members of the Academy with instructions to list up to five films.
Let's assume that 80% of members submitted their ballots; that would make for 4,626 ballots in all and 5% of this total is 232 votes.
There are three ways to get to 232:
- be listed first on a ballot;
- be listed second on a ballot with a film in first place so popular it triggers the surplus rule; or
- be listed second on a ballot with a film in first place that is tops with less than 1% of voters.
Ballots are sorted by the first choice and only those films listed at the top of at least one ballot remain in play.
The maximum number of Best Picture contenders is 10. In our scenario, the initial threshold for a nomination is set at 421 votes (4,626 divided by 11 and rounded up). If each of 10 films reached this cut-off, they would account for 4,210 ballots, making it mathematically impossible for an eleventh film to get 421 first place votes.
The surplus rule is applied to all films that are listed first on at least 10% more ballots than the initial threshold required for a nomination. (For other categories, the trigger is 20%). The rationale for this rule is so that someone can vote for a hugely popular picture without fear that their ballot doesn't matter.
In our scenario -- where the threhold is 421 votes -- the surplus rule would apply to those films which received at least 463 first place votes. Each of these ballots is apportioned as follows: a share goes to the first place film such that it reaches the initial nomination threshold and the remaining share goes to the second place film if it is still in play (otherwise to the next film on the list that is still in play).
Of our 30 Experts last year who were predicting the Oscars, 24 had "The Artist" in first place. Let's assume it was tops on 15% of the ballots returned; that would give it 694 first place votes. It only needed 421 first place votes to reach the initial threshold so each ballot was apportioned with .61 of the vote going to "The Artist" and .39 to the second place film if it is still in play (otherwise to the next film listed which is still in play). Those fractional votes are the equivalent of 273 ballots in all.
Three of our Experts ranked "The Descendants" in first place. Let's assume it made the grade with 12% of the voters; that would give it 555 first place votes. That total also triggered the surplus rule with .76 of the vote going to "The Descendants" and .24 to the second place film if it is still in play (otherwise to the next film listed which is still in play). Those fractional votes are the equivalent of 134 ballots in all.
Which films were likely to be listed second on those ballots that trigger the surplus rule? Did members who love "The Artist" like "Midnight in Paris" almost as much? Were those fans of "The Descendants" also enamored with "Moneyball"?
Those films that have less than 1% of the ballots following the surplus rule redistribution (in our scenario, that would be 46 ballots) are out of the running. These ballots are redistributed to the next film listed which is still in play (i.e. they will not be shifted to other films with less than 1% support found lower down on these ballots).
The counting is over at this point and all those films with at least 5% of the total ballots cast (in our scenario, 232 ballots) were the Best Picture nominees.
Among them, our 30 Experts were predicting 21 different films to be nominated for Best Picture. Of those with deep support, "The Artist," "The Descendants" and "The Help" make the grade with all of our Experts while "Hugo" got 29 votes and "Midnight in Paris," "Moneyball" and "War Horse" each earned 28 votes. All seven of these films ended up reaping Best Picture nominations.
That left, at best, three slots open.
"The Tree of Life" was predicted by 22 of our Experts to contend. While it was snubbed by the PGA, it had significant critical support. It cobbled together the 5% needed for a nod by a combination of first place votes and second place positioning behind films that triggered either the surplus or minimal rule.
The surprise nominee was "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" which also reached the requisite 5% threshold.
Win $1,000 predicting the Oscars
Win $100 Amazon gift certificates predicting the guild awards, Razzies and other kudos
Read more about entry and rules here. Make your initial Oscar predictions now. Change them later as often as you wish up until Oscar Day. Below, meet our past winners of recent award prediction contests.
Oscar Nominations: New York state resident Tim Kressner (gufa54) won $1,000 for reaping the highest percentage (78%) when predicting Academy Award noms. Watch our video chat with him here and learn his strategy for making picks. See the leaderboard here. See Kressner's predix here.
Golden Globes (Film): Mario Gomez, a med studen in Mexico, won our contest with the highest percentage of correct picks (86%) and highest point score (2,693). See our video chat with him here. Two other contestants also scored 86%: lulo1989 and eastwest. Tom O'Neil reaped best Experts' score. David Schnelwar had top score among our Editors. See the leaderboard here to see if you made the top tier.
Critics Choice Nominations: Bryce H scored an impressive 83% when sizing up 20 categories. That was one percentage point ahead of our smartest Editor, Daniel Montgomery. Our top Expert was also one of our Editors, Paul Sheehan, who reaped 74%. To see how you performed, check out our leaderboard plus the score section of your account page.
Golden Globe (Film) Nominations: Jonathan was our top User, reaping a staggering 86% when forecasting the lineup of 10 categories. That put him six percentage points ahead of our best Expert -- Scott Mantz (Access Hollywood) -- and eight ahead of our leading Editor, Daniel Montogomery. Did you made the cut on the leaderboard score breakdown?
Los Angeles Film Critics Association Award Winners: Christian aced all rivals, scoring 82%. That was almost 20 percentage points ahead of our top Expert (Edward Douglas of ComingSoon ) and Editor (Matt Noble), both of whom earned scores of 64%. Christian foresaw that surprise screenplay win for "Before Midnight." See leaderboard.