Jonathan Banks is back again being nominated for playing former cop turned hired gun Mike Ehrmantraut on AMC’s freshman series “Better Call Saul.” Banks was nominated in this category for playing Mike in 2013 when he was on “Breaking Bad” and was also nominated in 1989 for playing Frank McPike on “Wiseguy.” Banks has chosen “Five-0” as his episode submission this year for Best Drama Supporting Actor.
The episode opens in a flashback with Mike arriving in Albuquerque from Philadelphia. While waiting for his ride, he treats a gunshot wound that he’s managing to keep hidden in the bathroom. He’s picked up by his daughter-in-law Stacey and he explains that he wants to relocate there, remain sober and be a part of the life of his granddaughter, Kaylee. Stacey is apprehensive about having Mike in her life since she’s still unclear about certain things surrounding the death of her husband/his son, Matty. In the present, Jimmy (Bob Odenkirk) helps Mike get out of a bind with cops from Philly who are investigating Matty’s death and the death of his partners. Back with Stacey, Mike is confronted by her about what was going on with Matty in the weeks leading up to his death.
We then flashback to Philly with Mike getting drunk at a cop bar and seeing Matty’s old partners. Later as he’s stumbling home, the partners offer Mike a ride home in the back of their cruiser. As Mike drunkenly rambles about how they set Matty up, the cops drive Mike to an alley in a rough neighborhood where they intend to kill Mike and make it look like a suicide. Mike then surprises the cops at gunpoint, showing that he had been faking his drunkenness all along to set up the cops just as they set up his son. He shoots and kills both of them but one of the cops shoots Mike, explaining the earlier gunshot wound. We then see Mike with Stacey, tearing up at how he made Matty a lesser person telling him to go along with taking the money. When Stacey asks what happened to the cops, Mike responds that she knows what happened but that the real question is, can she live with it? Will the third time be the charm for Banks? Let’s take a look at the pros and cons:
Banks dominates this episode as the lead and is in the entire hour. The show’s normal lead Odenkirk only appears in one scene.
Banks gets an incredible amount of emotional range over the episode’s span. We see him as his normal curmudgeonly and stone-faced self but also get to see him as a vengeful father and a man full of remorse and sadness for the son that he lost.
If there’s any residual love for “Breaking Bad” and its characters, that can only help Banks in this situation.
The broader voting pool could reduce the importance of the episode selection in how they rank the nominees on their ballot.
Those who weren’t big fans of “Breaking Bad” might not fully get the emotional impact of everything that we find out about Mike.
Being overdue for an Emmy has never been a big factor in helping some people get Emmy love.
Make your own Emmys picks now to the right or at the bottom of this post. You could win one of our three prizes ($500, $300 and $200 Amazon gift certificates) as well as a place of honor on our leaderboard and a starring role in next year’s Top 24 Users (the two dozen folks who do the best predicting this year’s Emmys line-up).
Last year, our Experts had an accuracy rate of 58.62% when it came to predicting the Emmy winners. That score tied them with both Gold Derby’s Editors and the Top 24 Users (those two dozen folks who did the best at predicting last year’s Emmys). Our Users scored 51.72% (Click on any of these groups to see what they got right and wrong last year.)
Which group will be victorious this year? Meet the guy who won our contest to predict the Emmys last year — and learn how he did it and how you can be our next Gold Derby superstar.
As some of our Users turn out to be our smartest prognosticators, it’s important that you give us your predictions. Your picks influence our Users racetrack odds, which also factor into our official combined odds.
Photo Credit: Ursula Coyote/AMC