Home Forums Daytime TV 2019 DAYTIME EMMY REACTIONS

2019 DAYTIME EMMY REACTIONS

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 106 total)
Created
2 years ago
Last Reply
3 months ago
105
replies
12890
views
23
users
linecelts
23
StallionCity
20
montana82
14
  • Profile picture
    pietro_danton
    Joined:
    Feb 24th, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202882910

    There’s “something rotten in the state of Denmark”………………….. Totally asinine outcome to the million nominations.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Ardejah Cat Harbin
    Joined:
    Apr 22nd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202883062

    I like Maura better on ATWT as Carly, but I also like her as Ava on GH. I think the Emmy voters likes Woods reel better to vote for her to win. Maybe West’s reel was too over the top. Idk I’m just guessing.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Mootzic
    Joined:
    Mar 18th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202883214

    Kind of a whiplash night last night, but I am happy with the tech/drama results. People mentioned the relatively small cast presence, but no one knew Y&R would win. Y&R didn’t even know it would win and it must have been assumed it was a long shot they would. Then again, it could have been because of Young. I remember Chuck Pratt winning for best writing at 2017 Daytime Emmys despite the flack many gave him, and wondered if something could happen this year.

    Here is what I really liked. Shemar Moore giving recognition to Y&R for what they did this year. In 2019. That felt good to hear and after the rough two years the show has had, I am glad the show won its 10th Emmy.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Mootzic.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Mootzic.

    Shannon Mootz

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    linecelts
    Joined:
    Jun 18th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202883293

    Mal made mistakes ESPECIALLY getting rid of Doug Davidson (Paul Williams), thankfully JG brought him back, but he did win Y&R the trifecta.

    Now come to think of it, I did notice the cast presence was small………..

    If they submit the legendary Neil Winters (Kristoff St. John) death for next year’s Emmys then it could be their 11th Drama Series win.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by linecelts.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by linecelts.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by linecelts.
    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Kendall
    Joined:
    Nov 15th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202883370

    Maura West was robbed..point blank.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Jw79bull
    Joined:
    May 24th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202884358

    Kyler Pettit was on days for Two weeks last year, so how was he eligible for the emmy? There should be a rule that you must be on the show for a certain amount of time to get nominated…

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    EmmyLoser
    Joined:
    Nov 12th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202885156

    I don’t begrudge Kyler Pettis his nomination or his win. He was on for a very short amount of time in 2018, but really he was playing out the denouement of the huge shooting story from 2017. Unlike James Reynolds and Casey Moss, his best material in the story came at the end of it, but it would seem arbitrary and unfair for him not to be eligible based on where the calendar year begins and ends when he was an important part of a months-long story.

    That said, with the guest rules having been expanded to include returning actors as well, I wouldn’t mind if the academy set some limits or at least guidance to funnel actors into supporting/lead categories based on screen time.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Scoopster
    Joined:
    Sep 21st, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202885383

    You need to be on the show for at least 2 episodes to qualify.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    alokin
    Joined:
    Jun 23rd, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202898277

    Still on cloud 9 that Jacqueline won! She had a phenomenal year with so much challenging material to play, and wholeheartedly deserved to take home the trophy. I love how utterly surprised she was when her name was called, and was practically beaming on stage (plus, all of my Logan girls looked absolutely stunning!)

    Even though Kyler Pettis wasn’t my first choice, he is certainly the most seasoned actor in the bunch, and he was incredibly effective in Theo’s farewell scenes. So I’m okay with his win even though I’ve never particularly been a fan of his acting style (his choices in portraying a young man with autism too often came across as rather limited and unrealistic, though perhaps blame should not be placed so much on his interpretation as what was written on the page for the character).

    I get that most here were bummed about Maura West’s loss. I’ve always been a huge fan of her work and feel that she has turned in so many brilliant performances over the years. It should come as no wonder that she’s a multiple Emmy-winner. But that may have just as much been a curse as it is a blessing. Judges this year may have felt she’s already been amply rewarded, with a recent Lead Actress Emmy for a character that is not only relatively new to the 56-year-old GH canvas, but for the larger part, a villainous one (and very rarely does such a type of role translate to an Emmy win). Daniel also mentioned something very interesting in one of his recent articles, that no GH actress has ever won two Lead Actress Emmys, and had Maura won again this year, she would’ve been the first to break that spell. And let’s not forget that Maura won not one but THREE Lead Actress trophies in the span of just eleven years.

    Of course, some judges may have simply taken issue as I did with Maura’s submission. What she displays isn’t anything particularly novel that we haven’t seen her do many times before. Ava gets to run the whole gamut of emotions, but the reel’s true selling point (as is so often the case) rests in Maura’s trademark explosive brusqueness, a staple of most of her past reels (Carly’s alcoholism and intervention scenes on ATWT most prominently come to mind). It was so refreshing to see Maura win one of her two ATWT Lead Actress Emmys the year of Carly/Holden’s affair because it was for work that was so different than we’d been used to seeing from her up to that point, with so many varied, emotional undertones that she captured beautifully in her performances. I think the big challenge going forward (ie., next year’s submission) will be for the GH writers to come up with compelling story that will shed light on a completely undiscovered side to Ava. There’s a potential goldmine of possibilities in connection with Ava’s past, for instance, that the writers have yet to tap into.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    linecelts
    Joined:
    Jun 18th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202898474

    I’m still on cloud 9 on Y&R’s trifecta win even though people didn’t think they would win.

    A lot of people had DAYS winning Drama Series and Writing but after seeing what they submitted, I knew they wouldn’t win!!!

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Daytimeemmyfan
    Joined:
    May 22nd, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202946215

    Still on cloud 9 that Jacqueline won! She had a phenomenal year with so much challenging material to play, and wholeheartedly deserved to take home the trophy. I love how utterly surprised she was when her name was called, and was practically beaming on stage (plus, all of my Logan girls looked absolutely stunning!)

    Even though Kyler Pettis wasn’t my first choice, he is certainly the most seasoned actor in the bunch, and he was incredibly effective in Theo’s farewell scenes. So I’m okay with his win even though I’ve never particularly been a fan of his acting style (his choices in portraying a young man with autism too often came across as rather limited and unrealistic, though perhaps blame should not be placed so much on his interpretation as what was written on the page for the character).

    I get that most here were bummed about Maura West’s loss. I’ve always been a huge fan of her work and feel that she has turned in so many brilliant performances over the years. It should come as no wonder that she’s a multiple Emmy-winner. But that may have just as much been a curse as it is a blessing. Judges this year may have felt she’s already been amply rewarded, with a recent Lead Actress Emmy for a character that is not only relatively new to the 56-year-old GH canvas, but for the larger part, a villainous one (and very rarely does such a type of role translate to an Emmy win). Daniel also mentioned something very interesting in one of his recent articles, that no GH actress has ever won two Lead Actress Emmys, and had Maura won again this year, she would’ve been the first to break that spell. And let’s not forget that Maura won not one but THREE Lead Actress trophies in the span of just eleven years.

    Of course, some judges may have simply taken issue as I did with Maura’s submission. What she displays isn’t anything particularly novel that we haven’t seen her do many times before. Ava gets to run the whole gamut of emotions, but the reel’s true selling point (as is so often the case) rests in Maura’s trademark explosive brusqueness, a staple of most of her past reels (Carly’s alcoholism and intervention scenes on ATWT most prominently come to mind). It was so refreshing to see Maura win one of her two ATWT Lead Actress Emmys the year of Carly/Holden’s affair because it was for work that was so different than we’d been used to seeing from her up to that point, with so many varied, emotional undertones that she captured beautifully in her performances. I think the big challenge going forward (ie., next year’s submission) will be for the GH writers to come up with compelling story that will shed light on a completely undiscovered side to Ava. There’s a potential goldmine of possibilities in connection with Ava’s past, for instance, that the writers have yet to tap into.

    That’s not how the Emmys operated in the past. If you are good, you are good and it does not matter how many times you win. If the old pre-2008 panel was judging, she would have won one of these last three years and JMW’s win is about like DTB’s 2010 win. With four soaps on the air, so many undeserving emmy wins have taken place. I don’t feel acting is what it used to be and seeing these recent nominations goes to show that. No one complained when ES won six emmys or KZ won 4. We no longer have dominant winners anymore other than this GH actress. As for playing a villain, Eileen Davidson and Cynthia Watros may disagree.

    And Maura won for the alcohol story and the Carjack breakup. The Carly/Holden affair was in 2008 and I don’t believe it was eligible for 2009. I don’t believe she was in the running for the win. That was between Haskell and Morgan.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    ericjoseph33
    Joined:
    Jul 15th, 2020
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203660945

    That’s not how the Emmys operated in the past. If you are good, you are good and it does not matter how many times you win. If the old pre-2008 panel was judging, she would have won one of these last three years and JMW’s win is about like DTB’s 2010 win. With four soaps on the air, so many undeserving emmy wins have taken place. I don’t feel acting is what it used to be and seeing these recent nominations goes to show that. No one complained when ES won six emmys or KZ won 4. We no longer have dominant winners anymore other than this GH actress. As for playing a villain, Eileen Davidson and Cynthia Watros may disagree. And Maura won for the alcohol story and the Carjack breakup. The Carly/Holden affair was in 2008 and I don’t believe it was eligible for 2009. I don’t believe she was in the running for the win. That was between Haskell and Morgan.

    A year later late, but this notion that JMW isn’t a good actress and did not deserve her win is something I highly disagree with. It is not comparable to DTB’s 2010 win, because, JMW earned it.   Jacqui did ned B&B last year. Jacqui isn’t a newbie in the game of soaps, she has been on the show since 2008, over ten years, nominated for multiple Daytime Emmys. She EARNED that win. She carried B&B, and has done it for years.

    Heather Tom and Maura West are the most decorated actress in soaps, they get nominated every single year, and they will continue to do so. They don’t have to win every year, to prove their worth. Maura has 12 Emmy nominations, and 3 wins, and HT is almost at 20 noms, and six wins. They are fine. They are not robbed–Maura West is no Lucci, who did not win after 19 noms; she has three already on her mantle-ONE for the current role. The hate that Jacqui got for her DESERVING win, is still heinous imo and a major overeaction.  lt is not a headscratcher, and JMW definitely has improved over the years but she always has been a strong actress, and the moment she set foot on onscreen, standing her ground against and often outshinning veterans of the show, Susan Flannery, Ronn Moss, Hunter Tylo, Katherine Kelly Lang and Heather Tom.

    Maura West is a fantastic actress, and she would have been deserving of that win, but the panel went with JMW. JMW reel’s told a story, it had a range — she showed vulnerability, shame, regret, pain, love, childbirth, anger, frustration, and then acceptance, and growth. She showed range, u go from desperation to whole acceptance in a fifteen minute reel. For people who did not watch the show, she showed her skills and explained to them what happened.  It was not a weak reel; it the best work she has done. Another element, people always complain that the same people win every single year, and there is no variety, but when they gave you a new win — and people start rioting and asking people who already won to win again. So which is it?

    JMW earned that Emmy, point, blank, period. But I agree with the idea that Maura West does not have to win every year.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    linecelts
    Joined:
    Jun 18th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203661730

    A year later late, but this notion that JMW isn’t a good actress and did not deserve her win is something I highly disagree with. It is not comparable to DTB’s 2010 win, because, JMW earned it. Jacqui did ned B&B last year. Jacqui isn’t a newbie in the game of soaps, she has been on the show since 2008, over ten years, nominated for multiple Daytime Emmys. She EARNED that win. She carried B&B, and has done it for years.

    Heather Tom and Maura West are the most decorated actress in soaps, they get nominated every single year, and they will continue to do so. They don’t have to win every year, to prove their worth. Maura has 12 Emmy nominations, and 3 wins, and HT is almost at 20 noms, and six wins. They are fine. They are not robbed–Maura West is no Lucci, who did not win after 19 noms; she has three already on her mantle-ONE for the current role. The hate that Jacqui got for her DESERVING win, is still heinous imo and a major overeaction. lt is not a headscratcher, and JMW definitely has improved over the years but she always has been a strong actress, and the moment she set foot on onscreen, standing her ground against and often outshinning veterans of the show, Susan Flannery, Ronn Moss, Hunter Tylo, Katherine Kelly Lang and Heather Tom.

    Maura West is a fantastic actress, and she would have been deserving of that win, but the panel went with JMW. JMW reel’s told a story, it had a range — she showed vulnerability, shame, regret, pain, love, childbirth, anger, frustration, and then acceptance, and growth. She showed range, u go from desperation to whole acceptance in a fifteen minute reel. For people who did not watch the show, she showed her skills and explained to them what happened. It was not a weak reel; it the best work she has done. Another element, people always complain that the same people win every single year, and there is no variety, but when they gave you a new win — and people start rioting and asking people who already won to win again. So which is it?

    JMW earned that Emmy, point, blank, period. But I agree with the idea that Maura West does not have to win every year.

    Thank you so much for this ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    FreemanGriffin
    Joined:
    Feb 19th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203664194

    I like JMW but Maura deserved to win the past two years for her work.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    ericjoseph33
    Joined:
    Jul 15th, 2020
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203665617

    I like JMW but Maura deserved to win the past two years for her work.

    Well, the panel disagreed with that. The people who beat her also deserved their wins. It is a competition and people win fair and square. People have to recognize, judging someone’s acting ability is a subjective sentiment. Some people think West is OOT, some think she is the Meryl Streep of Daytime. It is based on the reel, and sometimes and I have noticed, prefer subtle work.

    I think Maura West is a phenomenal actress and deserves all the nominations she receives. I just don’t agree that we need to hear her name every single year.  I don’t find anything wrong with the Emmys spreading the love and giving a little gold to the underdog, yet a deserving underdog. I was just responding to unfair hate JMW got, because of the panel itself when voting went with her. It is like they blame JMW for putting herself in the running — she did not expect to win either, she was humbled, and thanked her fans (the only winner that night who did so). She earned this Emmy fair and square, she had the reel, she had to story, and she carried B&B and it is a bit exhausting having people say she did not deserve it when she, in fact, did.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 106 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
Freeman... - Nov 14, 2020
Daytime TV
EmmyLoser - Sep 15, 2020
Daytime TV
EmmyLoser - Aug 24, 2020
Daytime TV