




-
-
January 25, 2021 at 12:25 pm #1204001115
The problem with PYW losing AFI is that it’s performing really really well with critics awards. Why wouldn’t AFI appreciate it as much as critics groups? That doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t be nominated for BP, but that’s still an interesting question.
Maybe they just didn’t care idk. Or just happened to like the other movies more.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 12:31 pm #1204001136So they hated Promising Young Woman. Goddamn.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 12:35 pm #1204001150Do you know what the standard is for a foreign movie getting a special shoutout from AFI? Roma and Parasite got them right?
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 12:36 pm #1204001154Also, since the preferential ballot there’s been, at least, one movie that got into BP at the Oscars but missed both AFI and National Board of Review.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 12:37 pm #1204001158Do you know what the standard is for a foreign movie getting a special shoutout from AFI? Roma and Parasite got them right?
Special award is not mandatory. This year there isn’t a beloved foreign movie.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 12:41 pm #1204001165Just out of curiosity: has a movie ever won National Board of Review without being named in the AFI Top10?
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 1:11 pm #1204001225Just out of curiosity: has a movie ever won National Board of Review without being named in the AFI Top10?
In the past decade, I definitely recall A Most Violent Year did it. The way it went from winning Film, Actor and Supporting Actress to collapsing at the GG…lol
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 1:13 pm #1204001231In the past decade, I definitely recall A Most Violent Year did it. The way it went from winning Film, Actor and Supporting Actress to collapsing at the GG…lol
A Most Violent Year was from A24, so I’m not surprised it did that well there. They love A24 and Warner Bros. so expect to see Minari and Judas and the Black Messiah do well tomorrow.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 1:14 pm #1204001235Just out of curiosity: has a movie ever won National Board of Review without being named in the AFI Top10?
A Most Violent Year
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 2:54 pm #1204001403Eh News of the World isn’t a movie that inspires passion so it’s not surprising that it missed here, but it’s definitely a movie up the Academy’s alley, and it’s getting screenplay and editing at Oscars, so not predicting it in a lineup of 10 is a big no-no.
lol its not getting screenplay.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 3:29 pm #1204001483I’m surprised they didn’t throw a bone at films like The Invisible Man or even Tenet even if it was just as a symbolic gesture. I guess Soul is their “popular” choice this year.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 4:26 pm #1204001511Hmm I thought <i>Promising Young Woman </i>was eligible but it looks like it may have been ineligible due to a majority of its producers being British/Australian.
Weirdly enough Jackie was apparently ineligible for some reason?
I’ll just assume it was ineligible but here is the tweet I found.
https://twitter.com/ErickWeber/status/1353784671000096768
ReplyCopy URLFYC OSCARS : PROMISING YOUNG WOMAN IN ALL CATEGORIES (ESP. ACTRESS – Carey Mulligan AND ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY — EMERALD FENNELL), VANESSA KIRBY FOR "PIECES OF A WOMAN", ESSIE DAVIS FOR "BABYTEETH"
January 25, 2021 at 4:30 pm #1204001513If 1917 can make it then so can PYW, it was definitely eligible. People are just coming up with excuses to justify the snub.
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 4:36 pm #1204001523If PYW was ineligible for being produced mostly by non Americans, why was 1917 eligible last year?
ReplyCopy URLJanuary 25, 2021 at 4:37 pm #1204001525Hmm I thought <i>Promising Young Woman </i>was eligible but it looks like it may have been ineligible due to a majority of its producers being British/Australian.
Weirdly enough Jackie was apparently ineligible for some reason?
The tweet you posted doesn’t mention anyone’s nationality though. Both studios that produced the film are American so I think it’s clear that the film was eligible.
ReplyCopy URL
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.