Home Forums Movies Best Actress 2017

Best Actress 2017

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 542 total)
Created
4 years ago
Last Reply
4 years ago
541
( +10 hidden )
replies
69250
views
82
users
Philip
73
Bee
70
8CHRIS5
32
  • Profile picture
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966551
    This post was found to be inappropriate by the moderators and has been removed.
    Profile picture
    Bee
    Joined:
    Oct 25th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966553

    This is actually the first time where I’m more with the HFPA than “Critics” Choice. At least so I can see Natalie Portman winning her Globe.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    redcarpetfan
    Joined:
    Nov 17th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966561

    NOT emma stone but i do love her so maybe if no one else, better than natalie (sorry)
    sally field needs more recognition.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    M: The Original
    Joined:
    Aug 5th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966650

    sally field needs more recognition.

    Her 2nd Oscar speech is infamous enough without more opportunities to recreate it.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Anthony 🐜
    Joined:
    Jul 26th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966909

    Told yall. Televised awards will clear all this up.

    Portman’s sweep starts here.

    And of course pundits are scrambling right now to justify a possible Emma upset at SAG and BAFTA.

    Aint happening. Was never happening.

    2 x Oscar winner Natalie Portman people.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Philip
    Joined:
    Jan 29th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966927

    Well until SAG happens, we don’t know anything.

    BFCA only calls best actress about 60% of the time. 13/22 years.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    M: The Original
    Joined:
    Aug 5th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966932

    Told yall. Televised awards will clear all this up.

    Portman’s sweep starts here.

    And of course pundits are scrambling right now to justify a possible Emma upset at SAG and BAFTA.

    Aint happening. Was never happening.

    2 x Oscar winner Natalie Portman people.

    You’re really obnoxious.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966943
    This post was found to be inappropriate by the moderators and has been removed.
    Profile picture
    Anthony 🐜
    Joined:
    Jul 26th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966947

    Told yall. Televised awards will clear all this up.

    Portman’s sweep starts here.

    And of course pundits are scrambling right now to justify a possible Emma upset at SAG and BAFTA.

    Aint happening. Was never happening.

    2 x Oscar winner Natalie Portman people.

    You’re really obnoxious.

    Not obnoxious. Opinionated, as we all are.
    We all knew this was coming.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Philip
    Joined:
    Jan 29th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966952

    LOL at all the natalie detractors/stoners hurriedly changing their predictions.

    Or even worse: the yearly whining

    “We won’t know the winner until Oscar night.”

    “Critics circles determine the winner.”

    All while Natalie is beginning to sweep the televised precursors. Yet her detractors will likely still cling onto the possibility of an Emma or Isabelle win, using every lame excuse at their disposal.

    I don’t have a dog in the race at the moment cause I haven’t seen Jackie or La La Land, but it’s actually true that until SAG we don’t know much. Portman and Stone both win the GG and they don’t face off until SAG.

    I’m not saying Natalie can’t win again, but if her film under performs with the nominations, that could hurt her.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Sagand
    Joined:
    Jan 13th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966955

    Every year people make the argument that Film X is stronger than Film Y therefore performance in Film X is stronger than performance in Film Y, but it doesn’t work like that in the acting categories. Portman has the role and she’s the one to beat.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    8CHRIS5
    Joined:
    Apr 19th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966957

    Every year people make the argument that Film X is stronger than Film Y therefore performance in Film X is stronger than performance in Film Y, but it doesn’t work like that in the acting categories. Portman has the role and she’s the one to beat.

    Exactly! Jackie Kennedy in an election year, the Academy won’t ignore this.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966958
    This post was found to be inappropriate by the moderators and has been removed.
    Profile picture
    Philip
    Joined:
    Jan 29th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966960

    Lol. We all know she is gonna win the globe, let’s see what happens at SAG. Again no dog in this fight at the moment, but it’s the first major award she has won this season.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Dana Rimons
    Joined:
    Dec 12th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1201966963

    If those damn old geezers would actually view the performances of the nominated actors this year instead of checking off an easy name, things would be a hell of a lot better. Heck, if they did that a few years back, Portman would never have won for Black Swan. Heck, she wouldn’t even have been 2nd or 3rd that year. But they fell into that predictable “she’s young and pretty so let’s vote for her” way of thinking. Ugh. But they should really watch the performances this year.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 542 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
Stank83 - Jan 21, 2021
Movies
Monsoon... - Jan 20, 2021
Movies
Chris B... - Jan 19, 2021
Movies