Home Forums Movies Golden Globes Future

Golden Globes Future

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 164 total)
Created
2 months ago
Last Reply
4 weeks ago
163
replies
23701
views
71
users
boogiezen
9
crabbie
9
wolfali
8
  • Profile picture
    crabbie
    Joined:
    Feb 26th, 2021
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204252799

    It feels like we are in such a pivotal and historical moment in award season right now for the past 5 years lmao.

    2017: La La Land is accidentally announced as the Best Picture winner

    2020: Parasite becomes the first foreign language film to win Best Picture

    2021: Chloe Zhao is the first woman of color and second woman ever to win Best Director. Frances ties Katherine Hepburn’s Oscar count. Yuh-Jung Youn becomes the second Asian woman ever to win an acting Oscar.

    2022: Golden Globes is completely shunned out by the industry

    You have to wonder what 2023 will bring.

    Michelle Williams Oscar campaign manager.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    vinny
    Joined:
    May 20th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204252897

    You have to wonder what 2023 will bring.

    . The return of the gg announcement lol

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    salmonpie
    Joined:
    Oct 22nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204253173

    I don’t even get why they are the end-all/be-all. There’s too many issues with them, both morally and logistically.

    Critic’s Choice should start things off.

    Sorry, the Critics Choice is equally nonsense. These are broadcast film critics, many with questionable credentials, who pretend they represent all critics by changing their name from broadcast film critics award to critics choice award years ago even though most of the country’s most acclaimed film critics are not on their list of voters.

    Look at their choices. Mostly unimaginative duplicates that you can find on any other predictions lists out there, bear no resemblance to so-called major critics choices, and whose sole purpose is to get into the game of commercializing award shows to guess who the Oscar nominees are. And they are no less star f***ers. When they were broadcast film critics, no one gave a rat’s ass about them, that’s how important they were. And now they openly pride themselves in being accurate Oscar prognosticators, which tell you all you need to know about the credibility of this organization claiming to be film critics.

    And they are too incompetent to even put on a good show.

    At least the Globes as the first big award show of the season carves its own path despite sometimes ridiculous choices. And as far as insignificant award shows go, it’s hell of an entertaining show.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    salmonpie
    Joined:
    Oct 22nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204253192

    The #CriticsChoiceAwards have secured the early January spot, originally held by the #GoldenGlobes.

    Set to start off 2022 Award Season, they are known for having up to six-eight nominees in each category.

    Lol again.

    Exactly. 6-8 nominees so chances are most of them will end up as top 5 Oscar nominees and they have a whole host more stars in attendance.

    Another bunch of losers with no reason calling themselves critics.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    String Cheese Theory
    Joined:
    Aug 16th, 2020
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204253277

    We don’t need any type of critics’ awards shows period. Industry only. Studios just use the extra ceremonies to get their stream trains going and show off potential winners’ speeches.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    salmonpie
    Joined:
    Oct 22nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204253327

    The fact that Unbroken and Angelina Jolie were nominated by the (Broadcast Film) Critics Choice for Best Film and Best Director even though this very same group of people gave it a middling score among its own voting members on its own website tells you everything you need to know about this group. Nothing more than starphuckers.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    ENGLAND
    Joined:
    Oct 5th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204253708

    Get rid of CC, GG, & SAG.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Melvinezq
    Joined:
    Aug 7th, 2020
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204254425

    SAG.

    Well, it’s technically a guild, a union, and if it stops existing, thousands of actor will not completely get their right. In terms of award, it’s not only an award, but also the night of actor because they really promote those who don’t work as usual as what arr nominated, and it will be such a shame not to have an award that accommodate this whole union’s voice. It’s highly respectable, actually, to have this (more than GG) because it’s from actors, not journalists. If there’s an improvement, I think it will be getting rid of AFTRA from the voters, and not getting rid of the whole award.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    loudtoilet
    Joined:
    Feb 19th, 2020
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204254578

    Agreed, get rid of Globe, CC and AFTRA. Keeo Guilds and BAFTA.

    Most importantly, never, ever consider AACTA (Sp?) as the great indicator just because your favorite flopped with actual precursors. The rise of that award around here was solely because Mulligan flopped with HFPA.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    wolfali
    Joined:
    Sep 4th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204254605

    At least SAG and BAFTA make sense (they’re industry awards focusing on aspects of film that won’t be recognised elsewhere). What is even the point of the Globes and Critics Choice?

    FYC Emmys: "The Crown" in all categories, "I May Destroy You" in all categories, "It's a Sin" in all categories, "Small Axe" in all categories, Billie Piper ("I Hate Suzie"), Yvonne Strahovski ("Stateless") and Ruth Wilson ("His Dark Materials")

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Aimerarrow
    Joined:
    Feb 11th, 2021
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204254609

    Get rid of CC definitely yes. We need to keep SAG! After the generosity they gave to Parasite and Minari… I’m a fan.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    wolfali
    Joined:
    Sep 4th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204254690

    Get rid of CC definitely yes. We need to keep SAG! After the generosity they gave to Parasite and Minari… I’m a fan.

    And their Michaela Coel nomination.

    FYC Emmys: "The Crown" in all categories, "I May Destroy You" in all categories, "It's a Sin" in all categories, "Small Axe" in all categories, Billie Piper ("I Hate Suzie"), Yvonne Strahovski ("Stateless") and Ruth Wilson ("His Dark Materials")

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    mf617
    Joined:
    Oct 17th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204254740

    Critics Choice is not (solely) comprised of critics, it includes the journalists who amplify the CCs as a legitimate awards precursor. The only people who vote for the awards are also the people telling you that their awards matter. The hypocrisy is staggering and I try to warn people every year against watching or even considering who wins as part of our prognostications, but I think the journalists that are part of this organization will use this opportunity in a Globes-less year (future?) to try to make their show a big deal which is so frustrating.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    WildforFilm
    Joined:
    Jun 20th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204255031

    So no Globes means no recognition for Comedies anywhere now? That’s a shame.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    braydenfitzsimmons
    Joined:
    May 3rd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204255810

    CC

    Emmys FYC | Alan Tudyk in “Resident Alien” | Billie Piper in “I Hate Suzie” | Ego Nwodim in “Saturday Night Live” | Kaley Cuoco in “Harley Quinn” | “Dickinson” | “P-Valley” | “Pose” | “Superstore”

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 164 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
GMonty777 - Jun 13, 2021
Movies
RIDLEY ... - Jun 11, 2021
Movies