Home Forums Movies Poll: Pacino or Pesci

Poll: Pacino or Pesci

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 42 total)
Created
10 months ago
Last Reply
9 months ago
41
replies
2654
views
25
users
Human Bartender
6
babypook
5
Riley Chow
3
Poll: Pacino or Pesci
Joe Pesci is better in The Irishman
61 votes (58.65%)
Al Pacino is better in The Irishman
43 votes (41.35%)
  • Profile picture
    Riley Chow
    Joined:
    Oct 11th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209573

    Trying again, as the last poll did not seem to work.  I will see if I can merge the replies from the other thread here.

    Reply
    Profile picture
    fvg627
    Joined:
    Sep 23rd, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209118

    Not voting because I actually can’t decide. Maybe I will after rewatching.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209122
    This post was found to be inappropriate by the moderators and has been removed.
    Profile picture
    boss
    Joined:
    Aug 14th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209137

    Joe Pesci. He should even win.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Keth
    Joined:
    Dec 2nd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209152

    I voted for Al Pacino but Joe Pesci is also award worthy in “The Irishman.” A movie I really like, but I felt like I’ve seen it before in “Goodfellas” and “The Departed.”

    Pacino should be going for his third Oscar. His first two should have been “The Godfather, Part 2” (sorry Art Carney) and “Dog Day Afternoon” (Nicholson should have won for “The Last Detail” – the wrong Jack won that year). And Denzel Washington deserved two Oscars for his portrayal of “Malcolm X.” To have “A Scent of a Woman” attached to Pacino’s Oscar is one of the Academy’s biggest embarrassments – in my humble opinion.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Victor Cruz
    Joined:
    Sep 8th, 2013
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209159

    Pesci. There’s nuance in his performance while there’s barely any in Al Pacinos.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Joined:
    Jan 1st, 1970
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209161
    This post was found to be inappropriate by the moderators and has been removed.
    Profile picture
    Chimichanggas
    Joined:
    Dec 13th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209226

    Can both win in a tie? I’m dying to see this happen.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Foolio
    Joined:
    Jan 24th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209257

    Pacino is fiercely energetic, scenery-chewing and funny. The one problem with his performance is a certain lack of depth. He walks away with his scenes but doesn’t leave the audience – me anyway – with a deeper sensation of what kind of a human being Hoffa was underneath his showy facade.

    Pacino is Pacino to the max here, in many ways a less unbearable version of himself in The Devil’s Advocate. His Jimmy Hoffa has the mannerisms of Al Pacino, not the mannerisms of Jimmy Hoffa.

    Pesci is less showy and more subdued – but he projects a profound sense of a human being made of flesh and blood, and while Pacino impressed me more while I was watching the film, it’s Pesci’s work than crawled under my skin and left a more lasting mark.

    As far as Oscars go, while both have a shot at a nomination, I believe Pacino is the shoo-in as he acts in spades. Can’t see either of them threatening Pitt though.

    In the end this is a case of apples and oranges, so I suppose it’s just as well that I’m for some reason not able to cast a vote in the poll.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    mariogomez
    Joined:
    Jan 12th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209275

    Pacino is much better but Pesci is worthy too. It seems that Pacino will win Oscar over Pitt.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Human Bartender
    Joined:
    Apr 24th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209290

    Not sure if anyone else is having a problem viewing the poll results, but my vote goes to Pacino. I referred to him as a force of nature before, and I stand by that statement. He steals every single scene that he’s in. He’s got so much to work with portraying Jimmy Hoffa, and he knocks each component out of the park.

    However, I still loved Pesci. I’m predicting and hoping he can get nominated alongside Pacino, who I think and hope will win. I was impressed that he could so easily play a role against his type after being in retirement for so long. If it weren’t for Pacino’s presence, I think Pesci would be seen as a much stronger contender.

    Let’s Go Bucks

    ReplyCopy URL
    #1203209294

    Pacino, but DAMN it’s close. Pacino is larger than life in the movie, but Pesci is measured but also intimidating. I don’t mind who wins this poll.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Human Bartender
    Joined:
    Apr 24th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209421

    I’d just like to say that I thought Pacino’s work was multi layered as well, despite being much bigger and showier.

    Let’s Go Bucks

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Hector Raskolnikov
    Joined:
    Sep 8th, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209427

    What’s the deal with this stupid myth that a showy performance automatically means no or almost none subtlety or nuance? Where did your guys get that from? I have the impression that some people consider a more reserved performance is naturally better, deeper and more difficult than a more showy one, which is laughable. This’s not true at all, there is no rule about it.

    Pacino’s performance has MANY nuances and subtleties, even more than Pesci (an amazing performance too), I’d say. Although he is extremely energetic and charismatic, he shows, at key moments, a subtle vulnerability and even fear in his Jimmy Hoffa. The Frank Tribute dinner scene is the best example of this. Pay attention to his voice and expressions in the conversation with Frank.

    Pesci also has many nuances and subtleties, but this side of Russell is much more apparent and evident. It is clear from the beginning that the character hides things, is more reserved e etc. This, naturally, creates a subtlety for the character that Pesci exploits very well, but it’s a more obvious subtlety. You get what I mean? And with Jimmy Hoffa, Pacino exploits a hidden and unexpected subtlety.

    This “showy performance? No subtlety or nuance then” nonsense has also been used to devalue Joaquin’s Joker performance. It’s such a stupid and false criticism.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Profile picture
    Foolio
    Joined:
    Jan 24th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203209443

    ^ Not sure who has claimed a showy performance automatically means no nuance. I for one haven’t said so. The history of cinema is littered with showy performances that are nuanced to the max.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 42 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
Jasmine... - Sep 22, 2020
Movies
Stank83 - Sep 21, 2020
Movies
mateil - Sep 21, 2020
Movies