Home Forums Movies Win Best Supporting vs. Lose Best Leading

Win Best Supporting vs. Lose Best Leading

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Created
4 weeks ago
Last Reply
4 weeks ago
11
replies
729
views
9
users
M: The Original
2
RobertPius
2
O´Hara
1
Win Best Supporting vs. Lose Best Leading
Win Best Supporting
Lose Best Leading
  • ENGLAND
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 5th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593081

    I wanted to see how some felt on this subject. I’ve seen many say they would prefer a lead nod over a supporting win and vice versa.

    The scenario is that the actor/actress gives a great performance that is borderline between lead and supporting. If they submit for lead, they could possible lose, or if they submit for supporting, they will likely sweep.(This seems to happen alot.)

    What is your choice?

    Reply
    O´Hara
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 11th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593133

    Definitely win best supporting. An oscar is an oscar and even the most successful actors and actrecess like Meryl Streep Jack Nicholson Jessica Lange and Maggie Smith has an academy award for a supporting role

    ReplyCopy URL
    M: The Original
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 5th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593140

    Nothing special about losing in the lead category. Marisa Tomei only won supporting actress yet her win remains a topic of conversation.

    ReplyCopy URL
    keithw
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 17th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593149

    I think Viola Davis may have won lead for “Fences” but realized she was practically guaranteed the Oscar in supporting. Wise choice! Talia Shire (nominated Lead Actress in “Rocky”) should have gone supporting in her year. She would have almost certainly won. This also may have happened with Valerie Perrine (nominated in lead for “Lenny”).

    ReplyCopy URL
    RobertPius
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593191

    Shelley Winters used to discuss this topic a lot. She had already won a supporting award for The Diary of Anne Frank so she insisted she be campaigned as lead for Lolita then she didn’t even get nominated. She went back to supporting and won there again for A Patch of Blue. She used to say she learned that people remember you won but they forget for what category and what movie.

    ReplyCopy URL
    M: The Original
    Participant
    Joined:
    Aug 5th, 2014
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593192

    I think Viola Davis may have won lead for “Fences” but realized she was practically guaranteed the Oscar in supporting. Wise choice! Talia Shire (nominated Lead Actress in “Rocky”) should have gone supporting in her year. She would have almost certainly won. This also may have happened with Valerie Perrine (nominated in lead for “Lenny”).

    Network’s three acting wins feel set in stone regardless of the rival nominees in the category.

    ReplyCopy URL
    unown
    Participant
    Joined:
    Mar 28th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593206

    There is a reason Viola davis still wants that lead Oscar. It is just more prestigious in the industry i guess.

    But if u already have an Oscar the same industry doesn’t cares if its supporting or in lead so its a weird industry and mostly down to personal preference.

    End of the day an Oscar win is still an Oscar win.

    ReplyCopy URL
    RobertPius
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 22nd, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593214

    Michael Caine admits he sort of saw his win for Hannah and Her Sisters as a step down. He was starring in films at the time and then got a supporting award he didn’t really want. He infamously didn’t attend the ceremony to accept because he was filming some lame Jaws sequel but I think he now says he didn’t really want to go and didn’t try to get the filmmakers to let him go.

    When he won again he made all those jokes to Tom Cruise how he shouldn’t feel bad. Winning supporting just drives your price down etc.

    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by  RobertPius.
    ReplyCopy URL
    Marcus Snowden (The Artist Formerly Known as msnowden1)
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 18th, 2012
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593380

    I remember hearing that Al Pacino decided to boycott the 1973 ceremony because he wasn’t nominated in Lead. He felt that he should’ve been nominated there because he had more screentime in The Godfather than Marlon Brando, who was nominated for (and won) Best Actor. Pacino was nominated in Supporting, which he hated.

    ReplyCopy URL
    Andrew Carden
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 16th, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593446

    Another memorable instance was the campaigning of Peter Ustinov down in Best Supporting Actor for Topkapi. He’s unimpeachably Lead in the picture but Best Actor was a zoo (he probably wouldn’t have even been nominated), while Best Supporting Actor was a ghost town.

    THE OSCAR 100 (#30-26): Al Pacino, Edith Evans, Judy Garland, Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton

    ReplyCopy URL
    Mukund
    Participant
    Joined:
    May 27th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593448

    Win in supporting. It’s not easy to get the buzz, momentum and acclaim required to win an Oscar and even more difficult in case of a sweeper. It depends on luck as well, on how things align for you.

    ReplyCopy URL
    sofan
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 1st, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1202593563

    Winning is almost always better than losing.

    ReplyCopy URL
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
ENGLAND - Aug 20, 2018
Movies
Kevin K... - Aug 18, 2018
Movies
Tom O'Neil - Aug 18, 2018
Movies