-
-
They gave drama to GoT but it was mainoy due to the lack of an obvious alternative. The show had a very weak night with two wins only, just like last year. It has not won directing or writing in years. And none of the other acting nods turned into a in. It wasn’t the huge love fest some had expected.
ReplyCopy URLYou’re right. I don’t know why internet showed Angels in America as record holder. And how the hell I could forget about John Adams…oh, yes because it was boring as hell.
Lol, it was at least good to watch in history class. My high school history teacher had some good taste.
ReplyCopy URL#FreeTheBannedFour
Maybe this fiasco will trigger reforms in the Academy. If you can’t produce a comedy or drama with more than, say, eight episodes, you are automatically shipped to limited series. It is patently unfair to those shows who tell their stories more leisurely than those who want to rush things. The Emmy voters fell for the hype, the flavor of the moment with Fleabag. This cannot be repeated.
ReplyCopy URLGoT only won because it had no clear alternative and people working in production such as costumes etc voted for it. It’s clear directors, writers and actors were not here to award it. Netflix really should have released the crown in spring.
It won just as much Acting Awards as it did in it’s best years- yet still got 9 acting nominations. It lost writing last year as well yet still won Drama Series despite the hard competition. And yeah, the Directing thing was an embarrassment. But the only explanation I can find for it is vote splitting, which is exactly the opposite of lack of passion.
ReplyCopy URL
There’s no need to find excuses to diminish their accomplishments.
This post was found to be inappropriate by the moderators and has been removed.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
