Home Forums Television Emmys Movie/Limited Nominations Reactions

Emmys Movie/Limited Nominations Reactions

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 488 total)
Created
4 months ago
Last Reply
2 months ago
487
( +1 hidden )
replies
39510
views
89
users
Pulp
36
Andrea
30
sofan
20
  • montana82
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 14th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022292

    I am looking at the prediction and I must conclude that HBO’s check to the pundits must have bounced?

    How is it possible for Chernobyl to lose every award on the telecast?? That’s what it is currently predicted to do. That is insane to me and makes no sense. Based on it’s quality, popularity, and reviews it should win at least 3-4.

    I mean if WTSU is gonna take all the top prizes can you at least give Chernobyl a pity win in supporting actress or something?

    What is going on? SAD!

    "Here's a wonderfully b*tchy post from Montana82...." - Tom O'Neill Emmy Prediction Slugfest August 1st, 2019

    Miles
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 22nd, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022410

    Chernobyl was being predicted for Writing last time I checked. And as far as my opinion goes, I think it’s also taking Lead Actor.

    Ivo Stoyanov
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 3rd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022492

    Both Grant and Whishaw should easily win their categories, but A Very English Scandal has much less hype than the other limited nominees and I don’t think Amazon is pushing it that hard. A shame if neither is rewarded for such great work.

    Totally, both of them and the show itself (and the gorgeous music) are exquisite, I really hate the fact that HBO robbed the show’s spot on best Best Limited Series with Sharp Objects, a show ignored by both writers and directors..

    Lord Freddy Blackfyre
    Participant
    Joined:
    Nov 3rd, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022771

    I am looking at the prediction and I must conclude that HBO’s check to the pundits must have bounced? How is it possible for Chernobyl to lose every award on the telecast?? That’s what it is currently predicted to do. That is insane to me and makes no sense. Based on it’s quality, popularity, and reviews it should win at least 3-4. I mean if WTSU is gonna take all the top prizes can you at least give Chernobyl a pity win in supporting actress or something? What is going on? SAD!

     

    That’s GoldDerby being out of touch with reality

    The Oscar needs to get rid of the preferential ballot so it can name a deserving movie as Best Picture again.

    kellis
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 30th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022795

    I really hate the fact that HBO robbed the show’s spot on best Best Limited Series with Sharp Objects, a show ignored by both writers and directors..

    A Very English Scandal may have gotten the directing/writing noms before Sharp Objects (the extra spots undoubtedly lost in the Fosse/Verdon over-performance) and the latter was obviously last on the ballot, but SO got 5 below-the-line nominations versus the former’s 0. So, it’s clear it got in on having more support amongst the rest of the branches to overcome the 2 major snubs than AVES was ever going to have, not because of an HBO bias.

    “No user starts this shady” - someone culturally relevant.

    Jays
    Participant
    Joined:
    Dec 15th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022830

    My two cents (not like they matter though lol)

    Chernobyl > Sharp Objects > Escape at Dannemora > When They See Us > Fosse/Verdon

     

    Thatcher, Former Prime Minister of GoldDerby
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jan 3rd, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022917

    Darlings, Michelle Williams is NOT winning. You’ll see either Arquette or Adams getting a dildo for her vagina.

    I was your Prime Minister once.

    Miles
    Participant
    Joined:
    Oct 22nd, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022934

    If I’ve said it once I’ve said it a million times.

    This:

    is not a dildo. Ouch.

    estrelasdealgeruz
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 25th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022939

    Darlings, Michelle Williams is NOT winning. You’ll see either Arquette or Adams getting a dildo for her vagina.

    estrelasdealgeruz
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jul 25th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022956

    Darlings, Michelle Williams is NOT winning. You’ll see either Arquette or Adams getting a dildo for her vagina.

    She’s not winning here at GoldDerby awards. That’s a certainty. Amy is. But SHE’S WINNING THE EMMY!!!

    montana82
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 14th, 2011
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203022977

    Lamy Adams awards dream for Sharp Objects died when HBO held it off until the fall. She would have won against Regina last year.

    Michelle will deservedly win with only PAT ARQUETTE and her piece of paper a threat.

    "Here's a wonderfully b*tchy post from Montana82...." - Tom O'Neill Emmy Prediction Slugfest August 1st, 2019

    Pulp
    Participant
    Joined:
    Feb 13th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203023011

    If I’ve said it once I’ve said it a million times.

    This:

    is not a dildo. Ouch.

    Anything can be a dildo, have some imagination.

    Rachel
    Participant
    Joined:
    Sep 17th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203023039

    Ivo Stoyanov
    Participant
    Joined:
    Jun 3rd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203023374

    A Very English Scandal may have gotten the directing/writing noms before Sharp Objects (the extra spots undoubtedly lost in the Fosse/Verdon over-performance) and the latter was obviously last on the ballot, but SO got 5 below-the-line nominations versus the former’s 0. So, it’s clear it got in on having more support amongst the rest of the branches to overcome the 2 major snubs than AVES was ever going to have, not because of an HBO bias.

    This is an excellent explanation, the first one that makes sense to me, but still, I think that HBO bias helped Sharp Objects with the guild beyond the lines, it helped make them watch the shows. A Very English Scandal is better than Sharp Objects in those regards as well (the writing and the directing are a thousand times superior than those of SP, the fact that Dannemora and F/V got 2 noms and SP just further demonstrates how unimpressed were writers and directors with SP), but it was not seen by many people.

    Riley
    Keymaster
    Joined:
    Oct 11th, 2010
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1203023707

    When They See Us:
    1. Outstanding Limited Series
    2. Outstanding Writing for a Limited Series or Movie
    3. Outstanding Directing for a Limited Series or Movie
    4. Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited Series or Movie
    5. Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Limited Series or Movie
    6. Outstanding Casting for a Limited Series or Movie

    Fosse/Verdon:
    1. Outstanding Lead Actress in a Limited Series or Movie
    2. Outstanding Choreography for Scripted Programming
    3. Outstanding Hairstyling for a Limited Series or Movie
    4. Outstanding Makeup for a Limited Series or Movie

    Chernobyl:
    1. Outstanding Cinematography for a Limited Series or Movie
    2. Outstanding Picture Editing for a Limited Series or Movie
    3. Outstanding Sound Editing for a Limited Series or Movie
    4. Outstanding Sound Mixing for a Limited Series or Movie

    Black Mirror:
    1. Outstanding Movie
    2. Outstanding Creative Achievement in Interactive Media
    3. Outstanding Innovation in Interactive Programming

    Sharp Objects:
    1. Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Limited Series or Movie

    Good Omens:
    1. Outstanding Music Composition for a Limited Series or Movie

    Catch-22:
    1. Outstanding Special Visual Effects in a Supporting Role

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 488 total)

The topic ‘Emmys Movie/Limited Nominations Reactions’ is closed to new replies.

Similar Topics
Paul Sh... - Nov 10, 2019
Television
Boidiva02 - Nov 10, 2019
Television
David B... - Nov 7, 2019
Television