Home Forums Theater Shows that won Tonys for Best Score and Best Book, but not Best Musical

Shows that won Tonys for Best Score and Best Book, but not Best Musical

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
3 weeks ago
Last Reply
3 weeks ago
  • Profile picture
    Jul 5th, 2011

    As I looked back on shows that have won the Best Score and Best Book Tonys, but did not win Best Musical, I realized it has happened more times than I initially realized. This has happened in eight different years:

    Book & Score: On the Twentieth Century
    Musical: Ain’t Misbehavin’
    Ain’t Misbehavin’ obviously wasn’t eligible for Score; I’m not familiar enough with it to know whether it had an eligible book or not, but it wasn’t nominated. Perhaps this was just a case where a show was an overwhelming favorite, but wasn’t eligible in the Book & Score categories.

    Book & Score: Woman of the Year
    Musical: 42nd Street
    I think Woman of the Year was considered a lesser Kander & Ebb effort even at the time, but there was zero competition that year and this was likely a default win. Though it’s a little curious that it won Book over 42nd Street, which was nominated and was a hit show.

    Book & Score: Into the Woods
    Musical: Phantom of the Opera
    Probably the most famous example of this phenomenon. I think Harold Prince’s masterful presentation of Phantom and the sheer spectacle carried the day over Woods, which has its flaws. But voters were anxious to deliver a smackdown to ALW’s pretensions to operatic grandeur in the score category.

    Book & Score: Falsettos
    Musical: Crazy for You
    I call BS on this one. I didn’t care for Crazy for You, which was almost entirely a choreographic achievement. Falsettos perhaps just fell victim to not being “big” enough, particularly during the mega-musical age.

    Book & Score: Ragtime
    Musical: The Lion King
    I guess voters just went for the staging and design elements over the writing this year when it came to the big prize. I would have voted for Ragtime without hesitation, but the outcome isn’t particularly surprising here. This is the one I’m most curious to know how close the vote was.

    Book & Score: Parade
    Musical: Fosse
    Were voters so against awarding the top prize to a Lincoln Center art piece? Or is it just that they felt Parade was the best of a weak lot in the Book and Score categories?

    Book & Score: Urinetown
    Musical: Thoroughly Modern Millie
    I will always be convinced that the voters just didn’t want the name Urinetown listed in the pantheon of Best Musical Tony winners, lol.

    Book & Score: The Drowsy Chaperone
    Musical: Jersey Boys
    Jersey Boys was obviously a runaway hit. So it seems curious to me that Chaperone would win in the Book category when JB was eligible. If there was a bias against bio-musicals, why wouldn’t that have also come out in the vote for the top prize? As I recall, there was a general consensus that the book for JB was a model for writing a bio-musical.

    Which years do you think voters got it right and which did they get it wrong? Why do you think some of these happened? I tend to be biased towards writing; maybe others don’t weigh it as heavily.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
adamunc - Sep 11, 2020
adamunc - Sep 11, 2020