Home Forums Television Emmys: Problem of an Excess

Emmys: Problem of an Excess

CREATE A NEW TOPIC
CREATE A NEW POLL
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 45 total)
Created
11 months ago
Last Reply
11 months ago
44
replies
3457
views
26
users
Manav
8
wolfali
5
braydenfitzsi..
3

  • Manav
    Joined:
    Dec 21st, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924265

    I think we can agree that the Emmys have a problem to just keep on giving their favourite shows excessive nominations and wins even if the quality is inferior to other shows or to that particular shows’ previous seasons.

    Which shows/performances do you think overstayed their welcome at the Emmys? And what’s the reason?

    EDIT: One season overperformance will also count.

    • This topic was modified 11 months, 1 week ago by Manav.
    Reply

    Manav
    Joined:
    Dec 21st, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924266

    Excess: 4 wins for Peter Dinklage

    ReplyCopy URL

    jjjmoss
    Joined:
    Jun 2nd, 2016
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924270

    the crown

    jodie comer

    ReplyCopy URL

    JV
    Joined:
    Dec 31st, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924283

    the crown

    jodie comer

    All deserved

    And Jodie Comer won one emmy.

    ReplyCopy URL

    wilfredpickles
    Joined:
    Jul 15th, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924333

    This is a really random one (that I know I’ve mentioned bothers me in other threads) but the threepeat for Marvelous Mrs Maisel in Music Supervision was so unnecessary and boring. The category had only existed for a year before it started dominating. It’s quite a competitive category every year full of deserving winners for such an underrated aspect of TV but you wouldn’t know from looking at its history.

    ReplyCopy URL

    methaddiction
    Joined:
    Aug 1st, 2017
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924349

    Game of Thrones didn’t need 4 wins
    Modern Family didn’t need 5 wins

    ReplyCopy URL

    Onion
    Joined:
    Aug 1st, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924360

    Saturday Night Live should’ve stopped getting the amount of nominations it gets years ago.

    ReplyCopy URL

    Manav
    Joined:
    Dec 21st, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924364

    Game of Thrones didn’t need 4 wins
    Modern Family didn’t need 5 wins

    I think 3 for both Game Of Thrones and Modern Family would have been justified. 5 for Modern Family makes me wonder how many coattails it would have gotten under this current system. Ty Burrell and Julie Bowen would have gotten 4 wins on the bounce, something like Peter Dinklage.

    ReplyCopy URL

    Benjamonster86
    Joined:
    Apr 27th, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924366

    Modern Family winning five times in a row is the clearest example for me. It’s a little boring to have something win that many times in a row but I could have lived with it if the show was deserving. It’s third season win was questionable and winning for seasons four and especially five was unconscionable.

    My blog: http://benjamonsterstv.blogspot.com/

    My site: https://peaktvdatabase.weebly.com/

    ReplyCopy URL

    Pranshu
    Joined:
    Apr 1st, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924374

    Love Schitt’s Creek but that directing win definitely was a bit too much

    ReplyCopy URL

    Manav
    Joined:
    Dec 21st, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924376

    Saturday Night Live should’ve stopped getting the amount of nominations it gets years ago.

    Definitely. A Black Lady Sketch Show should have started winning it’s trophies.

    ReplyCopy URL

    marcus_emn
    Joined:
    May 8th, 2018
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924399

    I agree that Modern Family winning 5 times was way too much (especially since all most of them were undeserved), but even worse was it getting nominated 8 times in a row (again, most of them undeserved noms)

    ReplyCopy URL

    braydenfitzsimmons
    Joined:
    May 3rd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924402

    Excess: 4 wins for Peter Dinklage

    The thing is, Dinklage deserved 4 Emmys, just half of his were from the wrong seasons.

    ReplyCopy URL

    braydenfitzsimmons
    Joined:
    May 3rd, 2015
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924404

    I think 3 for both Game Of Thrones and Modern Family would have been justified. 5 for Modern Family makes me wonder how many coattails it would have gotten under this current system. Ty Burrell and Julie Bowen would have gotten 4 wins on the bounce, something like Peter Dinklage.

    Sarah Hyland absolutely would’ve happened at least one time (I’d personally nominate her over Bowen for S4). Maybe Winter as well. Can’t see either Gould or Rodriguez getting in unless Burrell (or someone) moved to lead or it was a field of 8 instead of a field of 5.

    I could see Banks, Devine, Lane and Riggle would’ve happened in Guest for every eligible season they appeared in.

    ReplyCopy URL

    YeohBestActress
    Joined:
    Sep 16th, 2019
    Topics:
    Posts:
    #1204924463

    Jim Parsons winning 4 Emmys

    ReplyCopy URL
    Why are you reporting this post? (optional):
    Not now
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 45 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Similar Topics
Skyler_... - Mar 25, 2023
Television
Allan V... - Mar 23, 2023
Television
Chris B... - Mar 16, 2023
Television