Forum Replies Created
October 7, 2019 at 4:50 am #1203125231
DiCaprio shouldn’t even get nominated. He’s mediocre compared to the other contenders.October 6, 2019 at 2:23 am #1203123536
DiCaprio was hot in his younger days but he aged like milk. Looks like a stuffed potato now.September 24, 2019 at 2:29 am #1203099357
This is wrong, I’ve seen Chernobyl fans list Jerome among the worst wins of the night for beating Harris, claiming that he was ‘robbed’. They have made it very obvious that had WTSU won, they would be in uproar. This thread is a perfect example of that. Not satisfied with their preferred show winning, they’re now convincing themselves of an editorial conspiracy.
I’ve seen many people cheering for both Jerome and Chernobyl. Few people said Harris should have won and it’s their right to like one performance over the other. And everyone was happy for Porter and considered him the best in the category.September 24, 2019 at 2:20 am #1203099350
Almost everyone including people who are discussing now why most awards pundits downplayed Chernobyl (intentionally or not) cheered when Jerome and Porter won. Guess they weren’t racists then. I think the experts assumed that WTSU would win on political narrative alone.September 19, 2019 at 11:48 am #1203086925
That said, WTSU maxed out in acting nods while Chernobly didn’t get in Jessie Buckley, who should have been an easy coattail nominee. If Assante Blackk was able to get in, then there’s no excuse for her not to. Plus, WTSU got three supporting players into the lead races – so the show absolutely has the support from actors, who make up one of the TV academy’s largest branches. So predicting Chernobyl to pick up acting wins over WTSU seems odd to me, unless vote-splitting really is that much of a factor in the supporting races.
Do you know how large? I know the Academy has around 25.000 members but I have no idea how many are actors. Anyway not all of them are going to vote with WTSU.September 17, 2019 at 12:09 pm #1203082716
This voter must be from California given the Barry vote over Fleabag. The Academy voters I know over here (it’s only a small group I’m not that cool) voted for Barry for Comedy Series which made last Sunday even more of a head-scratcher. But Tom had a very good point in the Emmy coverage video about Barry being huge in California. It might only be huge in California. Everyone else is probably going with Fleabag. I honestly think, despite my love for Barry, I’d vote for Fleabag. It was truly the best comedy of the year.
Not every voter who prefers Barry over Fleabag has to be from California lol. Barry is amazing.September 11, 2019 at 12:41 pm #1203069687
Damn. Some of you really want Harriet to bomb.September 8, 2019 at 11:38 am #1203063692
Even Booksmart has a somewhat low score. I think it will go under 7 in a few months.September 8, 2019 at 10:18 am #1203063625
I’m confused: why does Hustlers have a 92% on Rotten Tomatoes but a 5.6 on IMDB. Do audiences hate this film way more than critics? If so, that could be a bad sign.
This is what usually happens when movies feature a predominantly female cast. Incels can’t stand it.September 1, 2019 at 9:52 am #1203052030
I mean, Brad Pitt winning would be cool and all but when has anything ever been a lock in July ? Acting like no one could even challenge him, lmfao
I mean this is September and he’s still the lead in his category but whatever. I’m not a big fan of OUATIH so anyone else winning would be fine by me.