Forum Replies Created
June 21, 2019 at 6:29 am #1202946618
LMAOOO Not this again! Ain’t you tired, Ms. Goldderby? Ain’t you tired?
If you’d only read the posts in this thread, you’d think King was dead last in the poll when she’s actually in second place.
Want further proof that her detractors on this forum are simply a vocal minority? Look no further than the Derby film awards which had the exact same nominees as the poll, and was voted on by 6000+ users. Guess who prevailed there?
She’s clearly beloved and I’m sorry if that pisses you off lol. Y’all really need to quit being so butthurt and join the (Oscar and Emmy-)winning team! 😛April 24, 2019 at 6:59 am #1202864640
STAY… PRESSSED!February 25, 2019 at 8:35 pm #1202795019
hAs ShE pEaKeD tOo EaRlY?February 25, 2019 at 2:25 am #1202792993
“Remember, love is what brought you here. And if you trusted love this far, don’t panic now. Trust it all the way”
February 20, 2019 at 5:11 pm #1202783171
The Stallone and King comparsions would make sense if Rachel wasn’t already an Oscar winner
And the fact that she faces internal competition from her co-star. She literally just lost the Derby awards because of vote-splitting. The King haters don’t want to hear these facts thoFebruary 20, 2019 at 4:04 pm #1202783108
Jan, no one has said this but you. As we’ve been talking about in this thread, these ballots are always poor indicators (unless the individuals are doing a complete sweep), so we (or at least I) would still not be taking them seriously if it was Weisz or Adams.
K.February 20, 2019 at 3:53 pm #1202783096
Might I remind you that Stallone dominated the ballots in 2016?
So? My point is had Weisz or Adams been receiving the most votes on these ballots, you people wouldn’t be as quick to dismiss them. But since it’s King, it’s easy to say they don’t matter. Y’all are transparent af with your bias