Forum Replies Created
March 24, 2019 at 7:29 pm #1202828184
I’m going to get around to seeing this show later but I can’t wait to see Calum Worthy in this, I thought he was absolutely incredible in American Vandal Season 1.March 24, 2019 at 4:58 pm #1202828062
I agree with whoever said that the screenplay was a weak spot. It takes on way too much which affects the cohesiveness of the story. The plot actually kinds of fall apart upon deeper analysis, meaning that a lot of it just doesn’t make any sense.
I decided about halfway through my viewing that I was going to ignore this and instead enjoy the film for what it is, which is a very entertaining, funny, and thrilling ride. I know people want there to be deeper political context to the movie, and there very well might be, but I for one am not going to focus on that.March 24, 2019 at 4:18 pm #1202828045
From the look at the end, we’re supposed to think that Jason was either switched at some point (?) or has some sort of connection to the copies. He is definitely the one that is most intuitive about the clones: he figures out that the clone will copy his movements, which kills the clone. His “weirdness” supports that he could have possibly been switched because like Adelaide, he doesn’t connect with others, and he seems to know about Adelaide without being bothered by it.March 22, 2019 at 12:50 pm #1202826038
They are ruining Randall but giving Susan Kelechi Watson her best material ever, so there’s that. Not sure when Kevin ended up as my favorite of the Big Three, but here we are.
Kate has been coming off pretty well recently. Also people seem to be taking a stance against Randall as if him and Beth aren’t equally in the wrong. It doesn’t matter in the end because the show is so badly written but Beth’s character has been acting very immaturely even if Randall comes off as an ass sometimes.March 19, 2019 at 7:27 pm #1202822507
I’m inclined to believe that Evan Peters being listed as lead was a typo because all of the other FX shows grouped actors by category and Peters was after Bates (Supporting Actress). Also I could have sworn I read Peters listed as supporting earlier.March 19, 2019 at 5:13 pm #1202822413
I almost always get popcorn.
How relevant do you think the major networks (ABC, CBS, NBC) will be in 10 years?March 19, 2019 at 4:54 pm #1202822404
For Comedy Actress I have:
1. Julia Louis-Dreyfus
2. Rachel Brosnahan
3. Lily Tomlin
4. Allison Janney
5. Natasha Lyonne
6. Alison BrieMarch 19, 2019 at 4:01 pm #1202822394
Allison Janney’s repeated nominations are definitely not on the awards strength of her show and the fact that she was able to get into lead two years in a row, Oscar win or not, shows that there is support behind her. I don’t see her missing anytime soon.March 19, 2019 at 3:18 pm #1202822357
Why would Allison Janney and Lily Tomlin suddenly get dropped? I see them both getting in quite comfortably.March 17, 2019 at 7:02 pm #1202819901
To be fair, a lot of winners go on to sweep because their shows premiere in the spring, examples of which since Moore are Sarah Paulson and Nicole Kidman. Sweeping the precursors is never a negative thing, and in this case with two fall contenders against each other (Patricia Arquette and Amy Adams) it is especially positive.March 17, 2019 at 6:15 pm #1202819863
I thought it was a terrible film when I saw it in theaters so I’m going to have to say the exact opposite.March 17, 2019 at 2:40 pm #1202819717
Comer is not supporting by any stretch of the imagination. I don’t know why she would fraud when she has a secure spot in the lead category.March 17, 2019 at 1:55 pm #1202819675
I don’t see how Maggie Smith is any likelier to win than Judi Dench or Glenn Close, given that she hasn’t been nominated since 2001 and most of her 21st century filmography is Harry Potter films.