[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205292184

Love Lizzo’s win and speech!

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205291449

Exciting to see the evolution of hip hop. Best thing they did all night!

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205287845

It’s a damn shame they let Diana lose for the 13th time smh. Michael Buble did not need to win that category again.

X

Reply

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205286388

Wylan wrote:

Congrats Unholy for winning Best Pop Duo/Group Performance.

Could you guys not do that if they didn’t win? It gets confusing.

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205275490

Victor Cruz wrote:

Imagine thinking Charlize who basically swept that awards season 20 years ago didn’t have the attention Andrea is getting lmfao.

Andrea’s media attention eclipses Charlize’s that year. Sweep and all. People who don’t even follow the Oscars are talking about the former.

X

Reply

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205274923

Joe Langer wrote:

Everyone is watching this film now due to this scandal which is ironic

Yup. And now we have proof that she’s on the radar of the other branches. I don’t even think Charlize Theron, another lone nominee for Monster, received this much attention 20 years ago.

If SAG goes to Deadwyler, we may have an upset.

X

Reply

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205273031

Sean C wrote:

I don’t really buy the idea that “older, traditional voters” will back Maverick. Maverick is not the sort of film that would ever have won Best Picture a few decades ago.

Back then there was no preferential voting. They’ll likely place it above EEAAO on ballots.

X

Reply

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205273027

Chloe Sevigny stan <3 wrote:

Why is that on Andrea and not De Armas or Williams or the Academy who had FIVE nominee choices but left them out?

Frankly, I always saw Viola getting snubbed for that role. Not Oscar friendly at all.

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205272371

joesilver wrote:

Imagine if Andrea ends winning thanks to all this bullying against her lol

Many voters are probably going to see her movie because of curiosity and if they truly like her performance they could vote for her

I haven’t watched her movie so I don’t really know if she was that good.

Everyone is talking about Andrea in the circles I frequent, it’s crazy. She’s a serious contender for the win.

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205271328

Lol wow.

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205267629

laslo wrote:

Insert me into what? You said things about a person that I didn’t agree with and I just said my opinion defending them. I didn’t insult you at all but you told me to stay out of it. The facts are that predicting Margot Robbie all season is very different from predicting TPOTD and that Norma Jean is a troll. We don’t need to keep arguing because it won’t lead to anything.

You DID insert yourself into an argument that had nothing to do with you. Trying to call me bringing up TOTD, which was just last year, trash. You call it an opinion. I call it an insult. I said what I said. It wasn’t the same. Not even close. So stop responding to me.

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205267549

wolfali wrote:

Hmm I’m a bit confused here. Didn’t you amicably respond that you’re just on here “for shits and giggles” when you were asked, rather kindly, on this forum why you never have made predictions in the predictions centre?

Milk Money I don’t care about what’s going on in your life to make you want to come on here or whether you’re genuinely interested in predicting or like lurking and sharing your opinions or if you have a predictions accuracy of 100% or 2%. Those are all just stupid little things that life’s just not worth losing over.

But for far too long now you have gaslit, bullied, attacked, verbally abused and just been absolutely nasty to multiple users who have responded to your posts kindly enquiring and debating the things you have had to say.

Now you may say all of this is accusatory or that “I’m trying to get you” or that someone like Anna Delvey for example is trying to get you or that we’re just being smug about our own predictions (which I can assure you I at least am not because that would be just idiotic for multiple reasons). But really I just want you to now how some people including myself feel when we’re interacting with you on here.

I’m free to talk things through via the DMs on here because I believe there could just be a miscommunication or a conflict between passionate voices that can easily be allayed through dialogue but please don’t respond to this post on here because I don’t want to put yourself or myself or anyone on these forums through some sort of “tiring fight” and I will just simply ignore and not respond to it.

Um ok. Sure, my PMs are open if you’d like to chat. Anytime.

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205267526

laslo wrote:

Sit this one out? Do you think I’m scared of being insulted on an awards forum? Pls.
Be real for a second, that annoying troll Norma Jean just wanted to attract hate to Ana de Armas and was just another dupe of that someone we all know. I defended Ana de Armas from the beginning, I don’t need to prove it. You’re just hanging on to her because Margot Robbie was snubbed.

Lol, you’re right I’m devastated about Margot, who’ll more than likely be back in the conversation in the near future. I see you love inserting yourself into things that have nothing to do with you. And that “troll” was simply passionate about their pick. I told them to stick with it despite the naysayers and ridiculing on this board. Group bullying is so lame. In fact, it made me keep Ana in my predictions, too. So that was one I, we, got right!

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205267423

laslo wrote:

I think I speak for most people here that Wolfali is one of the nicest people around. You’ve been trying to push Margot Robbie all year, literally 19 days ago you were saying she was going to upset at the Globes. Trying to shame someone for predicting TPOTD (which was last year’s only reasonable result) is trash.

You might wanna sit this one out. I never attacked or shaded anyone for opposing my Margot prediction the way Wolfali and others did not that long ago over POTD. Please find one post where I did (unprovoked). And I disagree that it was last year’s only reasonable result. I was also one of the few here who defended that Ana de Armas fan that many of you called delusional and ridiculed on the daily. I hope they had the biggest smile on Oscar morning!

[Milk Money Joined: Oct 2nd, 2013 Topics: 0 Posts: 794 View Predictions]

#1205267394

film123 wrote:

And how is Andrea’s nomination not the reward, but somehow Yeoh is? I’m tired to people downplaying Yeoh’s chances of winning

Because if we’re speaking strictly about roles, there’s more examples of Riseborough’s winning than there is of Yeoh’s. The nature of the role can be just as important as the performance in this category. It’s part of the reason Carey lost.