Game Points
18875
Quiz Points
0
Total Points
Predict Hollywood Races
Members Since
Oct 06, 2018
Last Login
Mar 12, 2020
Game Points
Quiz Points
Total Points
He’ll never influence the Academy Awards directly ever again.
So many bullshit winners we had to endure due to his power. So much pain caused to people all around due to his abuse. So many careers derailed.
Fucking pig.
ReplyPoor Glenn gets such abuse for her gold dress. Streep wore gold for two of her Oscars. Maybe Glenn figured if it worked for Streep….
I know 🙁 Glenn no doubt thought it would be her night. Most of us did. White seems to be the color most winners have worn in the last years.
ReplyFassbender
Hardy
Gyllenhaal
Day-Lewis
Yes, confirmed. That’s the order in which we’d go down. That was the question, wasn’t it?
ReplyThe 2 frauds (Fraudkander and Fraudmara) shouldn’t have won, they should’ve gave it to Winslet so we know her thirsty ass is not a threat to winning another Oscar anytime soon.
LOL. She’s building up some serious thirst.
ReplyGaga. Was. Never. Getting. The. Oscar. Over. Colman.
Even with a hypothetical Golden Globe win in Actress, that ASIB movie lost so much steam that its major strength became the song. If Glenn in a fucking gold dress did not beat the British joy that is Colman, Lady Gaga was never going to accomplish that either. I mean…
ReplyIf category fraud was going to win that year, it should’ve been Mara. That being said, as I’m a stickler for being in the right category, I’d have given it to Jennifer Jason Leigh, even though I liked Mara’s performance better.
I hate when a new performer like Vikander (no beef with her) has a year where she’s pushed down our throats (It girls), which leads to an Oscar decision that affects many others more deserving work. I am now pissed for what they did to Mara 😠
ReplyBecause that would have lowered the chances of both Blanchett and Mara to win and the Academy “followed” the distributor’s suggestion or “instruction” of who should be considered for lead and who for supporting. However, it’s not always the case that when 2 actors/actresses are both nominated in lead none of them ends up winning, as proven by the cases of for example Terms of Endearment (MacLaine and Winger) and Amadeus (Abraham and Hulce).
Why on earth would they think Cate was competitive in Lead just a couple of years after BJ? That just fucked up Mara.
Reply100% lead. Mara’s placement is classic fraud and if she went lead, she would’ve saved us from a useless Jennifer Lawrence nomination.
Yas! words of wisdom have been spoken.
ReplyDefinitely a lead. The sad thing is, she probably would’ve been nominated if she went lead. I agree with the above, that while Mara and Blanchett are co-leads, if I had to choose which one is the real main character, it’s Mara, as we start the story with her and she’s the one who really changes.
A brilliant performance that, I think, deserves more love.
ReplyOh no!!!! The Exorcist is one of my Top 3 movies. Max was brilliant in it. Rest In Peace.
Reply
Would they really fuck over Close in supporting this year?
Sadly, yes.
ReplyDo you think their acting styles were at odds?
More like the directing limited their full potential, but your question is for sure a valid issue. The “big” scenes just didn’t work for me.
You so realize their characters are supposed to be incompatible right?
The portrayal of incompatible romantic interests does not exclude the notion of chemistry. There have been movie couples shown as “oil and water” on the surface but their scenes show powerful and passionate interaction. I had none of that in MS.
O’Russell got Lubezki on board for the cinematography. He really wants IT
I need a supercut clip of all the times he lost at the Oscars. Bonus: The moment where he raised his full a-hole potential when Riva won Bafta. What a waste of cells.
ReplyMarriage Story had two leads with no chemistry whatsoever. They really did a better (not outstanding AT ALL) job with their individual scenes.
